I spent some of last weekend at the
Eastercon. With images;
cc-by-sa on
everything.
Mostly it was really rather good, and the things wrong with it
were inevitable given the shape of the hotel. Half the programme was
in the red area, half in the blue, so every hour and a quarter the
corridor between them filled with people trying to get from one to the
other.
And it wasn't an especially big corridor: about two and a half British
standard fans wide.
This wasn't made easier by the dealers' rooms (green on my map above):
rather than the usual browse from one table to the next, anyone
visiting dealers had to go into the room. So if you weren't generally
interested in (say) artistic prints, you wouldn't stroll past and be
grabbed by something amazing. (But there wasn't any other space they
could have used.)
Also people stopped in the corridor to see what was in a specific room.
But on the other hand the real ale bar (in the blue area) was
well-stocked (much of it from Bingham's,
and I shall clearly have to investigate
Sherfield Village Brewery
too). Hardly any chairs, though, so mostly people didn't hang around
here.
The main reception/bar area, upper right on the map, was just a bit
strange, but as the only place with a significant amount of seating
that wasn't a programme room it became the default socialising spot.
I thought the sculpture was meant to represent the Earth's core, but
the central ball had recognisable land-mass outlines on it. Navigation
over the world, perhaps?
The lighting behind the bar gradually changed colour.
But enough of the venue: what about the convention? Well done, I
thought: what programme I went to worked, and once people had settled
on the main bar as a social area rather than trying to find space in
the Real Ale bar it all worked pretty well.
(Networks such as the telephone system are often described as having
an n² usefulness: the usefulness to each person is proportional to the
number of people who can be reached on it, so the usefuless as a whole
goes up as the square of the number of users. Thus is it significantly
better overall to have one big telephone network rather than two
medium-sized ones. For conventions that's true up to a point: there
are particular people I want to see, as well as meeting new people,
and the larger the convention the harder it is to find them. I suspect
that for me there may be a sweet spot in convention size of about
150-200, but it would have to be the right 150-200.)
Next year in Manchester; the year after that in Cardiff.
Comments on this post are now closed. If you have particular grounds for adding a late comment, comment on a more recent post quoting the URL of this one.