RogerBW's Blog

Will and Fright Checks 18 February 2014

Broadly speaking your resistance to intimidation, magical and psionic effects, and frightening and stressful situations, is determined by your Will stat. By default this is equal to your IQ; you can buy it up or down for five points per +/-1, and may find this referred to as "strong will" or "weak will".

Note that self-control rolls for mental disadvantages are unrelated to the Will stat - you can be an iron-jawed hero who still can't resist getting drunk when there's booze on offer.

Fright Checks are the most common sort of mundane Will roll, so there are lots of advantages and disadvantages that affect them. Note that, for purposes of Fright Checks only, you can never have a target number higher than 13. (It's not a waste to have a higher Fright Check number, because it still counts against other negative modifiers - the 13 is a final cap once everything has been applied.)

Combat Reflexes [15], among other things, gives +2 to all Fright Checks. (Therefore, so does Enhanced Time Sense.)

Combat Paralysis [-15], among other things, gives -2 to all Fright Checks.

Cowardice [-10*] gives a penalty to Fright Checks based on frequency of occurrence, -1 to -4.

Fearlessness [2/level] adds to your Will for Fright Checks, resisting intimidation, or externally-induced fear.

Fearfulness [-2/level] works the same way, but in reverse.

Unfazeable [15] frees you from having to make Fright Checks at all (and intimidation doesn't work on you either).

Post-Combat Shakes [-5*] doesn't modify your behaviour in combat, but does require you to make a self-control roll when the situation is over, and a Fright Check if you fail.

Xenophilia [-10*] gives a bonus to Fright Checks when meeting strange creatures.

You can help someone else with their Fright Checks: if you successfully make a Leadership skill roll as your action in a turn, everyone on your side who can hear you has a +1 to combat-related Fright Checks, self-control rolls, etc. until your next action. (+2 for a critical.)

  1. Posted by John Dallman at 02:51pm on 18 February 2014

    Unfazable must, however be maintained via role-playing. This isn't too hard, but you have to stick to it.

  2. Posted by Michael Cule at 07:58pm on 18 February 2014

    I should probably print that out.

    I'd forgotten about the Rule of 13 for one thing.

  3. Posted by RogerBW at 08:07pm on 18 February 2014

    John: I don't think Unfazable is incompatible with reasonable levels of caution; to me it means that when running away you say "I believe they may be too strong for us" rather than "oh zog we're all gonna DIE". (But I may in any case be over-prone to play cool, collected characters.)

    Michael: It doesn't help that GURPS calls it the Rule of 14 ("a roll of 14 or more is automatically a failure"). This doesn't mesh well with the way I think about it.

    Another thing I always forget about is the effect of Leadership. I sometimes think that any game with a military or otherwise structured party really ought to include Fright Checks on a frequent basis, if only to reward the PC who's nominally in charge and has therefore paid for a good Leadership skill. But the bonus isn't so huge as to make a difference very often.

    (And yes, I know that Social Engineering: Pulling Rank is out. Once the new W23 teething troubles have been resolved, I'll buy it.)

Comments on this post are now closed. If you have particular grounds for adding a late comment, comment on a more recent post quoting the URL of this one.

Tags 1920s 1930s 1940s 1950s 1960s 1970s 1980s 1990s 2000s 2010s 3d printing action advent of code aeronautics aikakirja anecdote animation anime army astronomy audio audio tech aviation base commerce battletech beer boardgaming book of the week bookmonth chain of command children chris chronicle church of no redeeming virtues cold war comedy computing contemporary cornish smuggler cosmic encounter coup covid-19 crime crystal cthulhu eternal cycling dead of winter doctor who documentary drama driving drone ecchi economics en garde espionage essen 2015 essen 2016 essen 2017 essen 2018 essen 2019 essen 2022 essen 2023 existential risk falklands war fandom fanfic fantasy feminism film firefly first world war flash point flight simulation food garmin drive gazebo genesys geocaching geodata gin gkp gurps gurps 101 gus harpoon historical history horror hugo 2014 hugo 2015 hugo 2016 hugo 2017 hugo 2018 hugo 2019 hugo 2020 hugo 2021 hugo 2022 hugo 2023 hugo 2024 hugo-nebula reread in brief avoid instrumented life javascript julian simpson julie enfield kickstarter kotlin learn to play leaving earth linux liquor lovecraftiana lua mecha men with beards mpd museum music mystery naval noir non-fiction one for the brow opera parody paul temple perl perl weekly challenge photography podcast politics postscript powers prediction privacy project woolsack pyracantha python quantum rail raku ranting raspberry pi reading reading boardgames social real life restaurant reviews romance rpg a day rpgs ruby rust scala science fiction scythe second world war security shipwreck simutrans smartphone south atlantic war squaddies stationery steampunk stuarts suburbia superheroes suspense television the resistance the weekly challenge thirsty meeples thriller tin soldier torg toys trailers travel type 26 type 31 type 45 vietnam war war wargaming weather wives and sweethearts writing about writing x-wing young adult
Special All book reviews, All film reviews
Produced by aikakirja v0.1