1996, dir. Jan de Bont, Helen Hunt, Bill Paxton:
IMDb /
allmovie
A team of atmospheric scientists chases tornadoes. Action ensues.
This was the number 2 grossing film of 1996, after Independence
Day and before the execrable Mission: Impossible. It's big, loud, and
often stupid. But it also has a sense of fun which is vital to my
enjoyment of any film.
It's unfortunate, then, that it opens with one of my less favourite
tropes: the female scientist who chose her field of study because
That's What Killed Daddy. Funny how this never applies to male
scientists.
The early scenes feel at first remarkably like a 1980s high school or
teen delinquent comedy: there's the underdog Good Frat House and the
rich and successful Bad Frat House, with insults and minor attacks
being thrown back and forth. (And of course Crichton was involved in
the writing, even if the script was thoroughly doctored after he'd
finished with it, which always means that the rebel scientists are
Right.) Cary Elwes as the Bad Scientist does his usual sneer, but the
script doesn't really know what to do with him beyond that and never
bothers to establish an actual basis for his villainy beyond "he's got
corporate sponsorship, boo hiss", and he vanishes for much of the
latter part of the film. No great loss; he's not needed for the story
except as something with a human face for the audience to boo, since
our heroine is already driven to get her project working.
At the same time as all the frat house hijinks, though, we have the
ongoing-divorce tension, which changes what could have been a fairly
by-the-numbers story into something slightly more interesting. Jami
Gertz, as Melissa, does an excellent job early on of portraying the
woman introduced to people who are clearly old friends of her
husband's, sharing memories with him that she's never going to be a
part of. Unfortunately immediately after that she comes over as so
terribly dim that one can't help wondering how Bill ever got involved
with her. The recurring joke about her answering phone calls wouldn't
be plausible in the rural USA even now, never mind in the 1990s.
One can't help feeling that it would have been better to design
Dorothy to be deployed really easily and quickly by pulling one cord
to turn on the power and release any lock-downs. And I'm not even a
user interface sort of guy. Still, it appears that the later probes
are thus designed, so maybe it's just a dramatic necessity thing.
There's certainly some Because It's In The Script towards the end;
there's a point where arms would simply be torn out of sockets. But
hey, it's Hollywood; nobody ever does accuracy.
The practical effects are excellent. When the production moves to
early CGI, as with the long-shot tornado sequences as opposed to the
close-up stuff in buildings, things feel a bit more lightweight, but
as long as you're not watching in ultra-high resolution this isn't a
major problem.
As for the principals, I've been a fan of Bill Paxton ever since
Aliens, and he and Hunt have a real on-screen chemistry which makes
them plausible both as people who got married back in the day and as
people who are falling back in love now. And, unusually for Crichton
or any big-name script-writer, her character isn't punished for her
obsession with her work or made to realise she'd be so much happier
pushing out babies.
There's a bit too much reliance on obvious cuts for humour ("We aren't
doing X!" Cut to X happening). Nobody beyond the two principals gets
more than a single-trait character, and they don't get much more. And
yes, tornadoes
do not work like that.
But in spite of all these things the pace and action, and the simple
and visceral story, carry the viewer over the rough spots. All of Jan
de Bont's overblown style as a director, that came over as silly in
Speed, works much better here. This is a big dumb summer film I can
enjoy.
Comments on this post are now closed. If you have particular grounds for adding a late comment, comment on a more recent post quoting the URL of this one.