Fourth in the Carrier series. "Tombstone" Magruder is now deputy CAG
aboard a Nimitz-class carrier, and Russia is invading Norway.
What do you do when you're writing a cold war series and there's
no more cold war? You restart it, of course. Writing near-future is
always a perilous game, and rapidly turns into alternative history.
Not that I mind that.
So this is happening, according to my new format, in the year 1992+5.
The 1991 Russian coup attempt has failed as happened historically, but
a second attempt has worked rather better and put a hard-line
communist government back in power. On the other hand, NATO has broken
up as various countries try to cash in the peace dividend, which means
in narrative terms that a single American carrier group is the only
significant combat force in position to help out in Norway as the
Soviets take Finland and head round the north end of Sweden (they're
not entirely stupid) into Norway in the chaos caused by a "terrorist"
assassination of the Norwegian leadership (and the Russian premier,
since he was too inconveniently reformist for the hard-liners). Yes,
the politics are somewhat implausible, but the politics in this sort
of book always exist primarily as a setup to put the good guys' lives
on the line with little enough support that they can come over as
heroes rather than the footsoldiers of an all-conquering global
empire. In that sense, the version here gets the job done.
Because this is a book about naval aviation, we have the Soviet
carrier Soyuz, second of the Kuznetsov class and similarly armed
with navalised MiG-29s and Su-27s, as was a reasonable speculation at
the time of writing. (And there's mention of a larger Soviet carrier
undergoing sea trials, which will presumably turn up in later books.)
There's less operational detail than we got on Kreml in Armageddon
Mode, but enough to be getting on with.
But most of the book deals with Matthew "Tombstone" Magruder as he's
forced to grow up a bit, learning his new job while under extreme
operational pressure. He's been away from carrier flying for a while,
since his reputation in previous books has allowed the Pentagon to use
him as a convenient hero for PR, and while he was hoping to get back
to flying F-14s he's now forced to think more about the other aircraft
on board. This is actually pretty decent material, getting away from
the Tombstone who's sometimes come across as a little over-privileged
and whiny, and forcing him into a new job that he needs to learn to be
good at before he gets his friends killed.
That, of course, is in between the battle scenes that we came for.
This is a full naval conflict, with some decent submarine and anti-sub
action as well as the aviation. During the climactic battle Tombstone
isn't even in the cockpit: he's had to learn to move on and leave the
flying to the more junior guys. Keith continues to be an engaging
writer, providing plenty of tension and excitement in this core of
the narrative.
Several characters are back from previous books, including Batman and
Coyote, and we also get a couple of Soviet viewpoints, a smart and
cocky young pilot and a more cynical and political CAG-equivalent. As
before, there are plenty of briefer views from other people too, so
that we can get a full picture of the various engagements that
develop.
There are multiple mentions of an "An-74" Soviet AEW aircraft,
reporting name Madcap and presumably a replacement for the Beriev A-50
(Il-76) Mainstay; this seems to be entirely fictional (the real An-74
is a STOL transport, an upgrade of the An-72). It seems still to be
land-based rather than launched from the Soviet carrier, so I wonder
slightly why Keith didn't just use the old Mainstay.
This is mostly a book that one reads for air and naval battles, and it
doesn't disappoint. There's not much lingering over the actual details
of hardware compared with some writers, though there are plenty of
name-checks. Best in the series so far.
Incidentally, there are no actual flame-outs in this book.
Followed by Maelstrom.
Comments on this post are now closed. If you have particular grounds for adding a late comment, comment on a more recent post quoting the URL of this one.