2014, dir. Gabe Ibañez, Antonio Banderas, Birgitte Hjort Sørensen:
IMDb /
allmovie
After the vast majority of humanity has been killed by solar storms,
robots keep the remainder alive in a small numer of cities. But some
robots seem to be breaking their rules.
Not that they're Asimov's Three Rules, mind you. They're simpler:
a robot may not harm any form of life, and a robot may not alter
itself in any way, including self-repair. Those of us who have read
Asimov will immediately spot the loopholes, but that's not what this
film is going to be about. Ibañez has never seen a cliché that he
doesn't like, especially if it was in Blade Runner; sure,
protagonist Jacq Vaucan may be an insurance claims adjuster rather
than a replicant hunter like Deckard, but a lot of the shots could
still fit into that earlier film. There are Significant Turtles.
Jacq's very pregnant wife (trope alert!) is even called Rachel.
So Jacq, whom we are never given any particular reason to like or
support, takes an investigative tour through the seedy underbelly of
Seedy Underbelly World and soon realises he's In Over His Head. Yes,
of course there's a sexbot. I suppose it's meant to be a tale of
attempted redemption out of a dark grey world, but why should I care
whether Jacq achieves his redemption if I didn't think very much of
him in the first place? Even if he is played by a shaven-headed
Antonio Banderas?
The story might be an interesting one, but my goodness, it's so
overloaded with boring stuff that we've seen so many times before that
most of the individual scenes turn out to be both tedious and
predictable, and often also clangingly Significant. (And at a flabby
pace there's plenty of time for things to drag.) Probably the best is
fairly early on when Melanie Griffith, as an illicit
robot-repairwoman, explains to Jacq something he should really have
known already about the need for the non-alteration protocol in order
to keep humans relevant; but that's because Griffith is good enough to
carry it off, not because the scriptwriters suddenly had a good day.
Ibañez and his two credited co-writers are obviously trying to tell
a story about machine evolution and the future of intelligence, but
they and their main character are so mired in the biochauvinist
xenophobic mindset that they can never quite break away and accept the
unavoidable consequence of the scenario they've set up. So we're stuck
with the same old tedious tale of existential risk that we've seen in
The Machine and Transcendence, because most of the time nobody
involved is able to conceptualise that life is life, and thought is
thought, whatever the physical substrate on which it occurs. Maybe
that's an idea that you can accept, and maybe it isn't, but that's
where the discussion should start; nobody here can even recognise
that the concept exists at all until we've had the vast majority of
the film and we're in the run-up to the final action sequence. I'd
have been much more interested in a film about the robot underclass
within human civilisation, rather than what we got.
Camerawork is a blend of generic and claustrophobic Blade Runner city
shots and rather more interesting wider scenes in the radioactive
desert outside. The soundtrack is gratuitously classical at times, and
the music over the final seconds of the credits left me laughing (not
in a good way). It's a perfect auditory capstone to the film, just as
the perfect visual one is an early scene showing a robot that's
committed suicide with "tears" leaking from its eyes as the smoke
rises from its toasted brain.
If you've never previously thought about AI and existential risk to
the human species, you may find something new here. Some reviewers are
calling it "highbrow"; I fear that in the context of a mainstream
audience they may be right. Otherwise, well, it's OK, I suppose; the
grime is pretty, but I can't really recommend it for more than
atmosphere.
Two separate people are credited for "product placement: Power Horse"
(an energy drink, apparently; I didn't notice). And even in a world
full of acidic rain and baking sun, nobody ever wears a hat.
Comments on this post are now closed. If you have particular grounds for adding a late comment, comment on a more recent post quoting the URL of this one.