2013 cosy mystery, fifth in Bradley's series set in the early 1950s
about child detective Flavia de Luce. The corpse of the
angelic-looking young organist has been hidden in a saint's tomb that
hasn't been opened for years. But how and why did he die?
This is a very polarising series, and if you don't get on with
the narrator you won't enjoy it at all. Flavia is a self-willed girl
of eleven, living with her father and two older sisters (mother died
climbing a mountain in Tibet before the war), a chemical prodigy who
specialises in poisons and an amateur sleuth. She's also thoroughly
sure of herself while trying to show off just a little, and her voice
is distinctive and advanced for her age (this is no young-adult book).
When they finally saw the light, I might even become something of a
village heroine, with banquets, etc. held in my honor, with
after-dinner speeches by Father, the vicar, the bishop, and, yes,
perhaps even by Magistrate Ridley-Smith himself, thanking me for my
dogged persistence, and so forth.
There's something of an anachronistic 'tween-wars sensibility to this
book set in 1951, as if Flavia's world is still insulated from the
changes the war has brought, but since the author's Canadian (and was
born a few years before his heroine) one doesn't know how much of this
is deliberate. This time there's also a surprising number of errors
that Flavia as presented shouldn't make (there's no such thing as a
degree Kelvin, and if there were it wouldn't work like that; and when
you've identified a substance, you call it by its structural formula
CO(NH2)2, not the mass-spectrometry-style CH4N2O). An editor ought to
have caught these even if the author didn't.
The plot itself is reasonably solid if a bit slight: a corpse shows up
where it shouldn't be, killed in a strange way. There are secret
tunnels, bleeding statues of saints (no surprises here if you are
familiar with the Rev. William Buckland), an ancient diamond, and an
ether explosion. It all gets a bit pulpy at times, but seen through
Flavia's pulp-inspired sensibility that's not unreasonable. The
murderer's identity didn't seem to me to be sufficiently justified.
Flavia remains in an ambiguous relationship with her foil Inspector
Hewitt, and it would have been good to see some progress there.
A long-running background plot reaches its climax in this last line of
this book, in pretty much the way I predicted when reading book one,
so I feel quite happy about that.
This is not a good place to become acquainted with Flavia, but if
you've enjoyed the earlier books I'd certainly recommend that you
continue with this one. Followed by The Dead in Their Vaulted
Arches.
Comments on this post are now closed. If you have particular grounds for adding a late comment, comment on a more recent post quoting the URL of this one.