2008 war story, first in Holland's Sergeant Jack Tanner series. In
April of 1940, British forces in Norway make a fighting retreat in the
face of the oncoming German invasion. Jack Tanner, of the King's Own
Yorkshire Rangers, must also deal with poor officers, being cut off
from friendly troops, and a civilian who has to be smuggled out of the
country.
This is a book that wears its inspiration on its sleeve: Sharpe,
of course, for the ill-trained and under-equipped unit that somehow
pulls through, but also a tradition of military road stories going all
the way back to the Anabasis.
It does get a bit infodumpy at times. When you can casually throw in a
paragraph like this:
Zellner had pondered these factors for a few moments. He was
twenty-four, an Austrian from Innsbruck, and had been with the 3rd
Gebirgsjager Division since Austrian and German unification
following the Anschluss two years before, and with the Austrian 5th
Gebirgsjager Division before that. He had trained with unflinching
dedication, proud not only to be part of such an obviously elite
unit but of his own performance. He understood the importance of
leading by example, and had been determined that he should be fitter
than any of his men; that he should be a better mountaineer; and
that his survival skills in sub-freezing conditions were second to
none. In this he had succeeded and he had arrived in Norway
confident that he and his men would be a match for any enemy troops
they confronted.
it's clear that you want the reader to know you've done your
research. Senior officers explain the tactical situation to each
other, even though they would both know it. Yeah, it's a standard
problem in this sort of thing, but it's still a problem.
Characters are as minimal as one would expect: one soldier is
particularly inexperienced, one was a safe-blower in London and that's
why he knows explosives, and Tanner himself is a gamekeeper's son with
secrets of his own; dark secrets he had never spoken about to a
living soul since he had joined the Army as a sixteen-year-old boy
soldier.
That background is the reason given for his being superbly good at
silent movement and sniping; he's had unofficial scope mountings added
to his rifle (I'm prepared to believe this could be done if one were
careful), but there's a question here about what GURPS would call
"power level". Is this meant to be a mud-and-blood grittily realistic
drama about ordinary people being pushed to the limits of their
ability? Or is it meant to be action-film or Warlord Comics heroic?
Because if it's the former, someone who can kill or wound ten enemy
soldiers in a single attack from a sniping position, without being hit
in return, seems a bit excessive; if it's the latter, someone should
have told the Germans. The only challenge that the enemy presents to
Tanner is one of numbers; individually these élite Gebirgsjägers don't
come over as significantly more competent than his own Territorial
troops.
Oh, and of course there's
a young woman - a pretty girl with an oval face, pale eyes, dark
eyebrows and straw-coloured hair
but this is a series book so we can't be having any of that thank
you very much. (And yes, she's threatened with sexual violence in
order to motivate our hero.)
Pacing is oddly repetitive: there's a battle, Tanner and his men get
away and take shelter in a farmhouse, and we cut to Germans talking
about what they'll do next or the British discussing the next phase of
the retreat. It doesn't really seem to build momentum, though there's
a big set-piece battle near the end.
There are small errors which an editor should have caught:
Tanner lit two German cigarettes from one of the orange Niderehe
packets he had taken from the prisoners the day before, and passed
it to Sykes.
and a general feeling of sloppiness about the writing which I suppose
shouldn't surprise me these days, but I still find it discouraging.
I wouldn't object to reading another of these if it were to come my
way, but I'm not going to seek them out. Followed by Darkest Hour.
Comments on this post are now closed. If you have particular grounds for adding a late comment, comment on a more recent post quoting the URL of this one.