1996 alternate-world military fiction; seventh in the Carrier series.
"Tombstone" Magruder is still CAG aboard USS Thomas Jefferson, which
is sent to the Black Sea for peacekeeping operations in the context of
the ongoing Russian civil war.
I get the feeling that Keith was having increasing difficulty
trying to come up with new trouble-spots for the carrier to be sent
to. Yes, you did read the first paragraph right: the Black Sea. The
setup is that the Turkish government is unwilling to allow American
aircraft to operate from or fly over their territory, but is
prepared to allow a carrier through the Bosphorus on its way to help
out in Georgia. Um, how's that again? I can see the Turks trying to
reach a compromise in order to stay on vaguely friendly terms with
Russia (after all, they have to live next door, while the Americans
can go home when the war is over), but this seems to me like such a
major step that they might just as well have allowed American aircraft
in too.
The politics are a bit strange, too, as the operation is shifted from
American assistance to the UN in Georgia to support for a UN-led
"surrender" of the Crimea by its Russian commanding general to UN
forces in the hope of preventing a Ukrainian invasion. Of course, it
all goes horribly wrong and there's fighting.
Now I know this is military fiction and I expect that the military
guys will be Good and the politicians will be Bad. That's the way
these things work. But a little before half-way through, a minor
character suddenly takes a sharp and unheralded turn straight into
Bircherism:
But the thought of handing over a sizable portion of American military
power to the United Nations was, for Magruder, a chilling one. If the
UN could send Americans into Georgia… or the Crimea… how long would
it be before they sent troops into Los Angeles to quell the next round
of rioting? Or into American homes to search for handguns? Or to arrest
American citizens for speaking out against this dark and twisted vision
of the New World Order?
(blink) (blink) Um, what?
I've come up with a crunch against infelicitous writing before, but
this is the first time I've been thrown so completely out of a story
by infelicitous politics. (There's also a female Secretary of
Defense who hates the Navy and pushes through lots of non-traditional
policies, which leads to vituperative use of the phrase "political
correctness" that would make a Daily Mail reader proud; and the one UN
person we meet, naturally a Foreigner, is a stickler for protocol and
gratuitously rude, both of which of course are just fine when Navy
people do them.)
I was also wondering briefly whether there was a chapter missing. The
last time we hear from the political types in Washington, they're
trying to work out what to do, with the civilians saying that with the
Bosphorus blocked and no chance of resupply they pretty much have no
option but to surrender the carrier to the nasty Russian faction.
(What the nasty Russian faction actually asked for was help from the
carrier group in deterring or repelling the expected Ukrainian
invasion.) The military men, when called on their blustering rejection
of this idea, can only come up with the idea of a double-ended
invasion of Turkey, with the carrier group and Marine force coming
down from the Black Sea and another going up from the Med, because
obviously that would work. The scene ends with nothing being decided.
And yet in the very next chapter our heroes have a plan to resupply
(just one of the three things they're running out of, with no mention
of the other two) and escape, which most definitely involves exceeding
the rules of engagement under which they've previously been labouring,
and nobody seems to care about this. So, um, was there a chapter 21a
that got cut, where the carrier group's commander decided to mutiny
against his political masters? Or a coup in Washington? Or something?
(This also means that what should be the climactic fight of the
seven-book series, against the last and biggest of the three Russian
carriers, is wrapped up in a paragraph in the epilogue.)
Of course I don't read these books for the politics, I read them for
the technical action and the occasional flash of good
characterisation. Unfortunately those aren't so great here either. An
enemy aircraft is identified by a pilot as a MiG-29, and six
paragraphs later by his back-seater as a MiG-27, but neither of them
seems to notice that they aren't agreeing. Visual identification is
actually quite important to the mini-story of one of the minor
characters, but nobody ever points out that the F-14 has a television
camera system quite specifically designed to allow the crew to
identify aircraft at very long ranges and record any sightings, the
use of which would break these plots comprehensively. It's claimed
that the AIM-54 Phoenix was designed both to shoot down Soviet
bombers at long range and to intercept cruise missiles; every source
I've read suggests only the former.
On the other hand there is a plausible level of confusion, with a
couple of friendly fire incidents, and a torpedoing of a Russian
submarine based on a misunderstanding, though it doesn't seem to me so
terrible an error as the characters think it is. (The Russian is near
the US carrier group, is being scanned by active sonar from multiple
ASW helos, and opens a torpedo tube to fire a decoy, the equivalent of
the American MObile Submarine Simulator – not that that would help
under active sonar. The US submarine in the Russian's baffles, under
"fire if friendlies are fired on" rules, hears the torpedo tube
flooding, and shoots. That seems to me a fair kill: were they supposed
to wait until they could hear torpedo screws in the water?)
It's not terrible, but it's not much good either; it feels sloppy.
This is the last entry in this series actually written by Bill Keith;
"Keith Douglass" was a house name that after this point was taken over
by other writers, whose names I haven't been able to discover. It
continues, I believe to a total of 23 volumes though I haven't been
able to find even an authoritative list of titles. In any case I don't
plan to follow; by all accounts quality drops off very sharply.
Comments on this post are now closed. If you have particular grounds for adding a late comment, comment on a more recent post quoting the URL of this one.