1938 classic English detective fiction; seventh of Marsh's novels of
Inspector Roderick Alleyn. Someone's blackmailing London's high
society as the Season begins, and Alleyn asks a friend who moves in
those circles to look into it; murder will be done.
When you know something about a crime, never say to someone "I
have more information but I'll tell you later". This never ends well.
I think I may need to back off a bit on my Marsh/Allingham
chronological reading, and mix in more books of other sorts. I've been
enjoying these, certainly, but shortly before the murder I was
confident, and the moment Alleyn first interviewed a particular
suspect I was absolutely sure, that that specific person was the
murderer. And I was right. That's the sort of feeling, watching the
various clues fall into place and admiring the misdirections, that
one's supposed to get on a second reading of a book.
It's always good to get contemporary atmosphere: this is still the era
of London fogs (the Clean Air Act wasn't until 1956), and when
oriental porcelain was all the rage. And there's a distinct feeling
that the whole Season is probably obsolete anyway, starting when
Alleyn's mother finds herself with a granddaughter to bring out since
the intermediate generation is posted to Fiji:
"Why has Sarah got to come out? Why can't she simply emerge?"
"That I cannot tell you, but George and Grace certainly could. I
rather see it, I must say, Roderick. A girl has such fun doing her
first season. There is nothing like it, ever again. And now we have
gone back to chaperones and all the rest of it, it really does seem
to have some of the old glamour."
"You mean debutantes have gone back to being treated like hothouse
flowers for three months and taking their chance as hardy perennials
for the rest of their lives?"
This feels in places like an counterpart to The Fashion in Shrouds,
published earlier in the same year: there's that same feeling of
decaying, overheated, desperate fun, and the sense that things can't
last. I'm going to quote at length, because this is a key passage for
the sensibility I'm picking up from this particular year:
… as he edged past dancing couples and over the feet of sitting
chaperones he suddenly felt as if an intruder had thrust open all
the windows of this neat little world and let in a flood of
uncompromising light. In this cruel light he saw the people he liked
best and they were changed and belittled. He saw his nephew Donald,
who had turned aside when they met in the hall, as a spoilt, selfish
boy with no honesty or ambition. He saw Evelyn Carrados as a woman
haunted by some memory that was discreditable, and hag-ridden by a
blackmailer. His imagination leapt into extravagance, and in many of
the men he fancied he saw something of the unscrupulousness of
Withers, the pomposity of Carrados, and the stupidity of old General
Halcut-Hackett. He was plunged into a violent depression that had a
sort of nightmarish quality. How many of these women were what he
still thought of as "virtuous"? And the debutantes? They had gone
back to chaperones and were guided and guarded by women, many of
whose own private lives would look ugly in this flood of hard light
that had been let in on Lord Robert's world. The girls were
sheltered by a convention for three months but at the same time they
heard all sorts of things that would have horrified and bewildered
his sister Mildred at their age. And he wondered if the Victorian
and Edwardian eras had been no more than freakish incidents in the
history of society and if their proprieties had been as artificial
as the paint on a modern woman's lips. This idea seemed abominable
to Lord Robert and he felt old and lonely for the first time in his
life.
Some people are in no doubt about what is wrong with the world:
"Every guest! Every guest! But, damn it, sir, the man was murdered
in a bloody cab, not a bloody ballroom. Some filthy bolshevistic
fascist," shouted the General, having a good deal of difficulty with
this strange collection of sibilants. He slightly dislodged his
upper plate but impatiently champed it back into position. "They're
all alike!" he added confusedly. "The whole damn boiling."
Others have their own opinions, like the Jewish girl being brought out
by a reluctant matron:
"Yesterday she told me there was a good deal to be said for the
German point of view, and asked me if I had any relations among the
refugees because she heard quite a number of English people were
taking them as maids."
Meanwhile there is of course a murder to be solved. One man is clearly
a Bad Hat ('On one wall hung a framed photograph of the sort
advertised in magazines as "artistic studio studies from the nude".'),
but while he's obviously capable of blackmail and murder, is he
actually guilty? There's the caterer to have in Society this season,
who certainly had access to various compromising information, but did
he use it? There's the victim's heir, who quarrelled with him; is he
less of a young idiot than he appears? And the victim was a good
friend of Alleyn's; he always tries to solve the case to the best of
his ability, but here he's personally affected as well. There's
perhaps a little much of the who-was-where for my taste, but it's all
well-handled.
And on top of all that there's the return of Agatha Troy; she also
moves in this part of Society, and is repeatedly thrown into Alleyn's
company in various awkward ways. This progress is often understated,
and never as convincing as that of Wimsey and Vane, but it has some
good moments nonetheless.
I wouldn't recommend this to someone who isn't already fairly steeped
in the conventions of this sort of mystery, but with that background I
enjoyed it greatly. Followed by Overture to Death.
Comments on this post are now closed. If you have particular grounds for adding a late comment, comment on a more recent post quoting the URL of this one.