1941 detective fiction; first of Brand's novels, and first to feature
Inspector Charlesworth. One of the senior staff of a London dress-shop
dies of poison; her co-workers are the only plausible suspects.
Yes, thanks to
Past Offences my chronological
reading of Allingham and Marsh has been extended to include Brand. The
setting for this story was very obviously inspired by Allingham's The
Fashion in Shrouds of a few years earlier, but it approaches the
problem from the opposite end. Where Allingham is primarily interested
in her characters, and makes the detection puzzle mostly a question of
who would have done the various things, Brand takes a more
conventional approach and concentrates on who could have: who could
have got hold of the poison, who could have put it in the victim's
food, and last of all who might have had a motive to see her dead.
There are ten suspects, and most of them are in play for most of the
book; it's perhaps slightly too many, and for me at least some of them
blended somewhat into each other as they're painted in very broad
strokes. Which is the one with the artist husband again? Phonetic
representations of lower-class accents abound. It's been suggested
that Brand worked on this book while working as a salesgirl herself
(in a different trade), as a way of working out her fantasies about
killing a co-worker or manager; I can believe these people might
originally have been drawn from the life, but they're so blurred they
would probably never have recognised themselves.
There's the owner, who seems to have been sleeping with half the
staff; the dress-designer, one of those terribly stereotyped
homosexuals whom everyone is happy to laugh at; the victim's
secretary; the "right hand" of the owner, "mannish" and unliked; the
three "vendeuses"; the three "mannequins"; and the charlady. (I note
that the vendeuses are all respectably "Mrs", though one of them's
widowed and another is going through a divorce; the mannequins have no
such social protection.) There's utterly ruthless narratorial policing
of acceptable behaviour: all women who do the right thing are
charming, all women who don't are horrible, all men who like books and
plays rather than fighting over women must be pansies, and so on.
Motives multiply too: a new branch is to be opened in Deauville and
several of the senior staff were in contention for the post, and there
are various possibilities of blackmail bandied about. (There's
absolutely no evidence of the ongoing war here, and I wonder how long
this book had been sitting before it was published.)
It rapidly becomes clear that everyone is lying; but everyone also has
something to lie about, things which are far more important to them
than the remote possibility of an accusation of murder. Charlesworth
flounders about, feels smug, falls for one of the suspects (the one
with the artist husband, in fact), and then a little over half-way
through gives up and gets another inspector brought in on the case
(though Charlesworth does solve it in the end). I suppose all the
evidence is there (though I have no recollection of one particular bit
being presented), but Brand does such a good job of keeping suspects
in play that the eventual killer was just one of several on my list.
What kept me going was the humour; it's fairly black and bitter at
times, but there are some good moments, as when Charlesworth is
admonishing a subordinate:
"Don't do it again, that's all. You needn't worry any more about it;
I've got it off my chest and it's over. How's the missus?" he added,
in a praiseworthy effort to make amends. P.C. Jenkins replied that
his wife passed away some years ago.
It's frankly lightweight, and certainly not on a par with the Big
Four, but there's good storytelling here. Followed many years later by
The Rose in Darkness.
Comments on this post are now closed. If you have particular grounds for adding a late comment, comment on a more recent post quoting the URL of this one.