RogerBW's Blog

Royal Navy School 05 January 2017

2016 reality television, 7 episodes. The series follows recruits through the ten weeks of selection for the Royal Navy at HMS Raleigh.

This is apparently what it takes to get me to watch reality television: a subject I find interesting and the chance to get a perspective that differs from my usual sources'. (And real tests rather than arbitrary challenges and popularity contests.) Even so, I don't plan to repeat the experience. I don't like an excess of tension, and each episode sets out to work up more and more of it with some new variant of the eternal question: will this particular recruit succeed or be thrown out? (Although the first instalment begins with arrival at Raleigh, and the last emphasises the final days before passing-out, they're not otherwise particularly time-bound; each episode deals primarily with particular recruits, and ends with subtitles describing the ends of their stories.)

Every episode drills in what I think is the crucial point of the whole business, though they talk around it rather than coming out and saying it: the reason for requiring such very exact standards of clothing, hygiene, discipline, and such like, stuff that people are told about but then have to get on with on their own, is not that those particular skills are important; it's that in a ship everyone from your mates to the Captain needs to be able to rely on you to do what you've been told, in the exact way in which you've been told to do it, even though nobody was watching over your shoulder after giving you the instruction.

Apart from the basic hard exercise, the whole business doesn't look all that difficult. Presumably they have something more than physical training, drill and laundry to do, but we never see it, except for a bit of the HAVOC damaged-ship simulator in one episode. Because of that lack, it's hard to feel sympathetic when people start fouling up, for what seem like really easy things not to foul up (like "don't use your phone in the messdeck" when it's allowed in lots of other places). The lesson that "choices equal consequences" does seem to be something that some of the recruits have never met before, whether they're school-leavers or "old men" in their thirties.

Everyone who's interviewed starts off pretty keen, but some of the recruits really seem as if they shouldn't be here, and by the end of the course I'm not convinced that they've all changed. Of course, this is television, and when they've got ten weeks' worth of footage for however many people agreed to be filmed, obviously they're mostly going to go for the ones with Big Emotional Moments rather than the ones who worked hard and sailed through without any problems.

Although it's never explained, there's clearly a multiple-level system of warnings and penalties in use, and reading between the lines those in charge seem to have fairly broad discretion as to what level they apply in a given situation; so they probably can keep in or throw out nearly anyone they want to as long as the errors aren't too blatant… but of course they don't tell the recruits that! Some recruits are clearly "scared straight" by a sufficiently intimidating warning; others aren't.

This has given me some ideas for NPC ratings in one of my current RPG campaigns, Wives and Sweethearts, which was really my purpose in watching it, so: mission accomplished. The programme's web site is within and episodes are still available at the time of writing, but only to Flash users.

Comments on this post are now closed. If you have particular grounds for adding a late comment, comment on a more recent post quoting the URL of this one.

Tags 1920s 1930s 1940s 1950s 1960s 1970s 1980s 1990s 2000s 2010s 3d printing action advent of code aeronautics aikakirja anecdote animation anime army astronomy audio audio tech aviation base commerce battletech beer boardgaming book of the week bookmonth chain of command children chris chronicle church of no redeeming virtues cold war comedy computing contemporary cornish smuggler cosmic encounter coup covid-19 crime cthulhu eternal cycling dead of winter doctor who documentary drama driving drone ecchi economics en garde espionage essen 2015 essen 2016 essen 2017 essen 2018 essen 2019 essen 2022 essen 2023 existential risk falklands war fandom fanfic fantasy feminism film firefly first world war flash point flight simulation food garmin drive gazebo genesys geocaching geodata gin gkp gurps gurps 101 gus harpoon historical history horror hugo 2014 hugo 2015 hugo 2016 hugo 2017 hugo 2018 hugo 2019 hugo 2020 hugo 2022 hugo-nebula reread in brief avoid instrumented life javascript julian simpson julie enfield kickstarter kotlin learn to play leaving earth linux liquor lovecraftiana lua mecha men with beards mpd museum music mystery naval noir non-fiction one for the brow opera parody paul temple perl perl weekly challenge photography podcast politics postscript powers prediction privacy project woolsack pyracantha python quantum rail raku ranting raspberry pi reading reading boardgames social real life restaurant reviews romance rpg a day rpgs ruby rust scala science fiction scythe second world war security shipwreck simutrans smartphone south atlantic war squaddies stationery steampunk stuarts suburbia superheroes suspense television the resistance the weekly challenge thirsty meeples thriller tin soldier torg toys trailers travel type 26 type 31 type 45 vietnam war war wargaming weather wives and sweethearts writing about writing x-wing young adult
Special All book reviews, All film reviews
Produced by aikakirja v0.1