Top Gear: 2015, 6 episodes; The Grand Tour: 2015-2016, 13 episodes. In
both cases, these are comedy shows lightly disguised as motoring
programmes.
I can see why: the actual "motoring programme" as it was invented
in the 1970s has become largely obsolete when one can find reviews of
the car one might want to buy, and the places where one might want to
drive, entirely adequately via the Internet. When Top Gear was
reinvented in 2002 (retaining the name, while most of the production
crew and cast went over to ITV to make the nominally more serious, but
frankly dismal, Fifth Gear), it began with some slight façade of
offering tips about normal cars that normal people might buy, but by
the second series it was already getting into rocket cars,
million-pound supercars, and smashing things up on screen.
In 2015, the BBC once more kept the name and fired a large part of the
cast and crew (well, they only fired one of the cast, but the other
two followed) who went off together to make their own show. But this
time the BBC didn't completely redesign the format to suit its new
presenters: they tried to continue the same thing, only with different
people.
Which was obviously going to be a failure, but just how much of a
failure wasn't clear until it became apparent that the new front-man
of the show was to be Chris Evans, one of the few DJs not to be up on
pædophilia charges. I haven't seen or heard any of his previous work,
but as a presenter he was too obviously a comedian: the point of
Top Gear version 2 was that it was presented as though it were the
serious car show that version 1 had been, which just happened to
involve doing very silly things, with a sly wink at the audience to
let them know that they were in on the joke. In the hands of Evans it
was just "ha ha, look at the silly man", a style of comedy that never
works for me. He was joined by Matt LeBlanc, an American actor whom I
also hadn't seen before but who had a very slightly better idea of
what was needed. Neither of them had any particular history with
motoring journalism, or motoring, or journalism; they were just there
to be silly.
So a "duel" between two sports cars saw them fitted with paintball
guns. The presenters raced Reliant Robins across England (painted with
the Union Flag and Stars and Stripes respectively). They continued to
interview celebrities and send them round the racetrack in a vaguely
normal car, which I always found the most boring part of the show. It
was all rather dull. (Evans has now left, but LeBlanc is apparently
staying.)
Meanwhile the Top Gear team went off to Amazon to make The Grand
Tour, only somewhat impaired by the BBC's retention of all the
trademarkable names and insistence that having celebrity guests on a
motoring show was a BBC monopoly. This is a crew that knows what it's
doing, and is only slightly hampered by interference from above: this
is most obvious in the second episode, with an extended one-joke
action sequence at a Jordanian special forces training base, most of
which has nothing to do with motoring. (If you've ever been to the
RIAT at Fairford, you'll have seen how the Jordanian government can be
very generous with its money but insists on having its own stuff on
display as part of the result.)
Where it gets more interesting is in the "challenges", coming up with
(for example) eco-friendly car bodies (meat and bone, a construction
of plants and hazel wands, and blocks of mud), or beach buggies to go
a thousand miles across Namibia. That's the sort of challenge a
hypothetical serious motoring show might do, and the humour lies in
the silly answers the team comes up with.
But mostly this series is more of the same performance art: three
middle-aged men playing at being opinionated prats and messing around
with millions of pounds of cars. It's getting a bit old, and so are
they, but there's some life in the format yet.
Comments on this post are now closed. If you have particular grounds for adding a late comment, comment on a more recent post quoting the URL of this one.