RogerBW's Blog

Conviction 11 September 2017

2016-2017, 13 episodes. Hayes Morrison, daughter of an ex-president and living with a party-girl reputation, runs a unit that reviews old cases.

So basically this is a criminal investigation show, effectively a police procedural, except that the crimes happened years ago, the forensic science has mostly already been done, and the person convicted probably didn't do it. I probably wouldn't have given this a look had it not been for Hayley Atwell in the lead (and Shawn Ashmore as the guy who would have got the job and ends up working under her).

But lots of uninspired cop shows do well, so why did this one feel like a dead show walking right from episode one? I think that people who watch a cop show want to think cops in general mostly get it right, and every episode here is about how they got it wrong, at least potentially. Some of the victims turn out to be guilty of something else, but even that's still a police error. So people may have been predisposed to dislike it even before the often-clumsy writing and heavy-handed character development became apparent. (Every character in the main cast has a Past, and Problems which will be worked out in thirty-second chunks in between the cases of the week.)

There's always a short deadline, a single-digit number of days, and it's never explained why this is the case (only one of the episodes actually deals with a pending execution). Once one notices this, it tends to feel very artificial – as if the unit didn't have enough problems already!

Even Hayley Atwell's performance is patchy. Sometimes she's on fire and dominates the screen; sometimes she just presides over case meetings and lets everyone else do the work, and whether she was told to tone down the charisma or simply didn't bring it to what was in those episodes effectively a bit part, the end result is inconsistent.

The show wasn't renewed, and indeed it was effectively cancelled after five episodes had aired. I can't say it was a great loss, but it had a few good moments, and I'm still surprised this got so much early negativity when something really terrible and even more predictable (like Lethal Weapon or The Exorcist) didn't.

[Buy this at Amazon] and help support the blog.

Add A Comment

Your Name
Your Email
Your Comment

Your submission will be ignored if any field is left blank, but your email address will not be displayed. Comments will be processed through markdown.

Search
Archive
Tags 1920s 1930s 1940s 1950s 1960s 1970s 1980s 1990s 2000s 2010s 3d printing action aeronautics aikakirja anecdote animation anime army astronomy audio tech base commerce battletech beer boardgaming bookmonth chain of command children chronicle church of no redeeming virtues cold war comedy computing contemporary cornish smuggler cosmic encounter coup cycling dead of winter doctor who documentary drama driving drone ecchi espionage essen 2015 essen 2016 existential risk falklands war fandom fantasy film firefly first world war flash point food garmin drive gazebo geodata gurps gurps 101 harpoon historical history horror hugo 2014 hugo 2015 hugo 2016 hugo 2017 hugo-nebula reread in brief avoid instrumented life kickstarter learn to play leaving earth linux mecha museum mystery naval non-fiction one for the brow opera perl photography podcast politics powers prediction privacy project woolsack pyracantha quantum rail ranting raspberry pi reading reading boardgames social readings real life restaurant reviews romance rpg a day rpgs science fiction scythe second world war security shipwreck simutrans south atlantic war squaddies stationery steampunk stuarts suburbia superheroes suspense television the resistance thirsty meeples thriller tin soldier torg toys trailers travel vietnam war war wargaming weather wives and sweethearts writing about writing x-wing young adult
Special All book reviews, All film reviews
Produced by aikakirja v0.1