1990 mystery; first in Perry's William Monk series (Victorian police
work). In 1856 London, Monk wakes up in hospital with no idea of his
own name or job, but soon discovers that he's a police detective, and
is given a new case to work on, the beating to death of a popular
veteran of the Crimea. But as he finds out more about the man he used
to be, he doesn't like him very much.
There are mystery readers in communities like Goodreads who do
challenges: in January, they say, everyone in the group should read a
book with a colour in the title, or with a female detective, or
whatever. As I did some research for this review, I found I'd been
doing a challenge of my own: this is a book written by a convicted
murderess. Anne Perry was born Juliet Hulme, of the
Parker-Hulme murder case,
as interpreted in film in Heavenly Creatures (Hulme was the one
played by Kate Winslet in her film début). "In later life, Perry has
written books that particularly focus on sin, repentance, and the
price of redemption."
But that doesn't need to colour one's interpretation of the book,
which is mid-century Victorian mud and nastiness. Joscelin Gray was
beaten to death by someone who clearly hated him, a lot, since they
kept beating long after he was dead (this is repeated several times,
presumably in case the reader thinks that beating a corpse is
perfectly normal). Pretty much everyone of any status despises the
police in general and Monk in particular, and are brutal to anyone
they can get away with being brutal to; pretty much everyone else we
meet is a criminal of some sort; the few good guys are of course all
terribly concerned with the plight of the poor, in a way which doesn't
seem entirely historically plausible but is probably necessary so as
not to lose the reader's sympathy for them as well as everyone else.
Monk's rediscovery of himself and those around him is intriguingly
observed, and certainly not complete here; but more interesting to me
is the second narrative voice, that of Hester Latterly, who went out
as a volunteer with Florence Nightingale, and has seen things in
Scutari and elsewhere that make her unfit for a society that would
prefer not to think about the gory implications of a fairly pointless
war.
It's quite a slow-paced book, with interior monologue interlarded into
most conversations; the actual process of detection relies rather too
heavily on coincidence and guesswork rather than evidence and
reasoning. All the same it's enjoyable, largely for the characters,
and I plan to read more of this series.
Followed by A Dangerous Mourning.
Comments on this post are now closed. If you have particular grounds for adding a late comment, comment on a more recent post quoting the URL of this one.