This short book is a survey of histories of the Second World War.
Keegan argues that there is no single definitive history of the
conflict (something that's probably still true twenty years later),
and divides the bulk of the book into five sections: overall
histories, biographies, specific campaigns, specialist subjects such
as cryptography and economics, and occupation and resistance. In each
he lists the books he recommends, and a few well-known ones that he
doesn't, in the context of a high-level overview of the topic.
But it's actually chapter one that I found most interesting, dealing
with controversies: Taylor's suggestion that the war happened by
accident as Hitler didn't expect Britain to defend Poland, the
possibility of American foreknowledge of the Pearl Harbor attack, but
more interestingly why Churchill deployed British forces to the Middle
East, how much good the various resistance movements might have done
with more supply, and whether there was any point at all to area
bombing of Germany.
Keegan clearly has strong opinions and doesn't always justify them as
well as he might, but his writing is persuasive and always enjoyable.
He even makes a point in favour of David Irving, whose Hitler's War
he rates as an excellent piece of research even if it's also somewhat
hagiographic.
The book is possibly a little outdated now, but it's still a useful
guide to available material.
Comments on this post are now closed. If you have particular grounds for adding a late comment, comment on a more recent post quoting the URL of this one.