1993 mystery, third in Perry's William Monk series (Victorian
investigation). In 1857, General Thaddeus Carlyon, a military hero,
dies in an accident during a dinner party; but when the police decide
it might have been murder, his widow confesses. She is sure to be
hanged, but the justification she gives for her action is clearly
false; Monk the private investigator, Oliver Rathbone the barrister,
and Hester Latterly the nurse returned from the Crimea, work together
to dig out what really happened.
It's all a very slow business, with key passages being given
repeatedly as various people talk to each other, and the whole thing
drowns under period detail that's poured on with an over-generous
hand. All the good people find the legal position of women horrible –
which, yes, it was, but if that had been such a common feeling as is
presented here, female ownership of property and rights in their
children wouldn't have taken further decades to become law. Instead,
by casually espousing these revolutionary ideas and not apparently
realising that they are revolutionary, the principals end up feeling
like modern people transplanted into the Victorian age.
The reason for the killing can be summed up in a sentence, and it's
one that's spoken about two-thirds of the way through the book. Most
of the final third consists of court-room scenes, in which Rathbone
tries to swing a jury from "hang her now" to "the minimum sentence
allowed by law"… but the two supposed principals of the series, Monk
and Hester, suffer by comparison, especially when Monk also has to
squeeze in a sub-plot about a recurring vision from his pre-amnesia
life.
(And the judge has a gavel. No English judge has ever had a gavel;
its presence here reeks of too much research done by watching American
legal dramas. So do the courtroom theatrics by Rathbone, which seem
fairly excessive even for those same legal dramas.)
However, that mid-book revelation means that much of the first section
is spent on going round in circles while waiting to receive it, and
the parts of the latter section that aren't set in the court mostly go
round in circles trying to get other bits of information to let
Rathbone win the case. One particular secret is revealed entirely
without need (vg frrzf gb zr gung "V ernyvfrq gung guvf obl unq orra
nohfrq whfg yvxr gur bgure obl V'q frra ba n qvssrerag bppnfvba" jbhyq
or whfg nf rssrpgvir n eriryngvba nf "V ernyvfrq gung guvf obl jnf zl
vyyrtvgvzngr fba, naq gung ur unq orra nohfrq rgp."). But all the bad
people come to bad ends, or at least social ruin, so that's all right.
I think this book would have been better with a razor-happy editor,
and less of a disproportionate emphasis on Rathbone (who's clearly
destined to lose out to Monk in the slow-burn romatic rivalry). The
research is mostly pretty good, but I could have used less of it and
more of the people. Followed by A Sudden, Fearful Death.
Comments on this post are now closed. If you have particular grounds for adding a late comment, comment on a more recent post quoting the URL of this one.