Chibnall writes again (though this time with a co-author), but with a
very different emphasis.
Usually the rules of these things mean that the junior
collaborator does most of the work, but Malorie Blackman has a
reasonable amount of clout; by most accounts she seems to do a good
job in her books of talking about racism without descending into
Author's Message.
But then I saw "Montgomery, Alabama 1943" and groaned just a little. I
am entirely ready to admit that there are people who still need to be
told that Racism Is Bad, but it's so very easy to over-egg the pudding
and come over as preachy… and sorry, but this pudding is more egg than
anything else.
Yeah, I like the idea that someone wants to mess with time to
achieve, er, something, by changing an historical event; it's a
possible implication of having a time-travel setting that we rarely
see in this show (and The Time Meddler is a story I remember
fondly). And I am glad that we're not getting another VFX-fest like
the first two episodes. But surely you can find something more to say
about the American South in 1955, with lots of research into how to
be accurate about showing casual murder and the bus system for
non-white people and everything else, than "racism is bad, and all
racists are horrible stupid people, and all the people they despise
are saints"?
I know this is a thing I always say, but I keep having occasion to say
it. The story I want to see in this kind of setting, and maybe I'm
going to have to write it myself, is one with fallible humans – with a
racist who goes along with what "everybody does" not because they're
cackling Evildoers but simply because it's the easy option (until
their eyes are opened); or with a non-white person who's no saint but
just trying to get along until something pushes them too far (unlike
this Rosa who is Always Right); in general, with complex people
rather than just these tedious stereotypes. Think about Rolf(e) in
The Sound of Music, who happily joins the Nazis but has moments of
hesitation when it comes to arresting his putative girlfriend and her
family – that's perhaps not a masterpiece of characterisation, but
it's more subtlety than anyone here can manage, in a musical that's
nearly sixty years old.
Instead we get that first scene in the hotel which could just as
easily have happened in the TARDIS, except that then we wouldn't have
had Generic Nasty Policeman. And we get a villain for the episode
who's just another racist, only a particularly stupid one. (Now, if
only the story had ever bothered to put those two people up against
each other!)
If you want the story to change the minds of racists, telling them
"you are stupid" is not the way to do it. If you want to help
non-racists feel smug because they are the Good Guys and, unlike the
bad guys here, hardly ever beat up a non-white person for looking at
them funny… then mission accomplished, I guess.
And, well, if you're going to say that Rosa Parks did what she did at
least in part because of her contact with the time travellers, as they
script repeatedly tries to hint… doesn't that rather devalue her own
decision to act?
It's a shame, because this had some very good parts, and could have
been excellent – just a bit more sophistication about the characters,
a bit of humanisation of anyone who wasn't in the main cast, and I'd
have loved it.
Comments on this post are now closed. If you have particular grounds for adding a late comment, comment on a more recent post quoting the URL of this one.