Doctor Who presents: Nightmare in Norway.
This starts off looking like a basic horror story, the sort of
thing the show has done plenty of times before, but soon shifts into
an effective SF puzzle: what's going on, why are things this way,
should anything be done about it, and if so can it be?
I think that invoking an Ultimate Cosmic Power is a bit of a mis-step,
though; this show has lots of those already, and the story being told
is really quite a small and personal one. This Doctor would already
rather talk her way out of a situation than fight or tech her way out,
so why not just give her that chance?
Splitting Ryan off from the rest of the party to give him some
character moments is a decent idea. But leaving him to be casually
knocked out by a small girl is not so great. Letting him make the Big
Discovery about the monster in the woods: good. Having the others hear
it from Erik rather than from him, so that he gets no validation from
them: less good.
I wonder rather about Ribbons. It's a very 1980s/1990s Star
Trek-looking alien – and sounds like one too. But it's even stupider
than they usually were, and in the end it has basically no effect on
the plot except to show the audience how the monster works; it could
have been dropped completely, especially considering how easily
everyone else seems to find their way through the place later. I do
hope that this wasn't one of those episodes where good stuff was cut
for time in order to keep blatant padding like this on the screen.
Shouldn't northern Norway in winter have a bit of snow? Why do you
need to secure the house when it was already secure except for where
you broke into it? How do you cut a string someone's paying out
without their noticing, especially since it stays taut? Why would Erik
not simply have taken his daughter into the other world with him, to
live as a family?
It's all very well to say "she's not your wife, she's just a copy",
but if she's a perfect mind emulation of your wife with all her
memories there's something more to be said there. Even without a
Magical Blind Person to tell the real from the fake.
And if everyone else is being tempted to stay by images of lost loved
ones, the frog on a chair is a bit bathetic.
This ends up feeling like about half a good story, and half lazy
short-cuts. Yes, the above/below parallels about loss and bowing to
the inevitable are a decent idea, if not at all original, but I was
hoping for a bit more.
Given two episodes which fall apart thoroughly in the third act, it
seems like an odd production decision to broadcast them in successive
weeks. I can only assume that the producers didn't share this
perception.
Still, I did expect the "grandad" moment to be kept back for the
finale.
Coming up next: back to Chibnall's writing, oh well, and the last
regular episode of the series (though there's a New Year special to
come, apparently).
Comments on this post are now closed. If you have particular grounds for adding a late comment, comment on a more recent post quoting the URL of this one.