1998 mystery; sixth in Brett's Mrs Pargeter series (amateur
sleuthing). The late Mr Pargeter was a criminal mastermind, though his
wife "knew nothing about that"; now the dying widow of a thief who
worked for him wants to restore all her stolen paintings to their
rightful owners, and of course Mrs Pargeter agrees to help.
Well, Brett finally did it: here's a book with no murdering in it
at all, and barely anything for Mrs Pargeter to detect. Instead it's
much more along the lines of a caper story, as she and her late
husband's associates plot and execute the anti-crime of smuggling the
paintings back to where they should be, while dealing with rival
crooks, a mole in their organisation, and two bungling policemen.
Almost everyone here is a comic character of the "look at the silly
man" school, and it was during a sequence involving a fake television
programme that I finally realised (after 22 books) just what it is
that makes me faintly uncomfortable about Brett's writing: he's like
that bitchy friend who always has something cruel and amusing to say
about people one doesn't like, but whom one always suspects may be
just as cruel and amusing about oneself to other people. Yes, sure,
aren't television watchers all very stupid, ho ho ho, but do I
really believe that Brett wouldn't be just as unpleasant about
detective story readers to his mates at the BBC? No, no I don't.
He nodded complacently. 'No problem, Mrs Pargeter. I've videoed all
four of my mum's weddings.'
The entire point of the series has been that Mrs Pargeter herself
could always pretend that there was no crime going on, that these
people with names like "Hedgeclipper" Clinton and "Concrete" Jacket
were simply rough diamonds to whom the late Mr Pargeter had been very
generous. It's a bit of a balancing act but it works reasonably well.
But here, Mrs Pargeter engages in unabashed criminality while keeping
up the façade of not knowing what's happening – and at the same time
continues to damn all hypocrites.
The plot doesn't really hold together either, with all the criminal
opposition ending up fitted up for major crimes that they had nothing
to do with; yes, yes, hacking into the police computer, but one can't
help feeling that the utter lack of actual evidence might be
considered a slight impediment when it came to trial.
It doesn't help that the writing is pedestrian in the extreme, and I
found myself finishing Brett's sentences just by thinking of what
would be the most obvious cliché and then realising that it was what
he'd written – not to mention the repeated phrases like "the full beam
of her violet-blue eyes" which, as they did for Homer, simply serve to
bulk up the word count. It's pap, and Brett did at least have the
grace to realise it and end the series here. (There's no especial
conclusion, as each of these books is complete in itself, but
certainly there's nothing important left hanging.)
Followed seventeen years later by Mrs Pargeter's Principle, but it's
one of my truisms that when a writer returns to a series after a gap
of more than a decade it's very rarely any good, and I don't like
these enough to find out whether they're an exception.
Comments on this post are now closed. If you have particular grounds for adding a late comment, comment on a more recent post quoting the URL of this one.