Clarkesworld is a monthly on-line magazine edited by Neil Clarke.
Everything is available in HTML from
the magazine's site, and
it can be bought in various other formats.
"The Visible Frontier" by Grace Seybold has someone learning about
navigation on a strange world:
"So you don't trust sky maps for navigation, not by themselves," the
captain continued. "Shore maps can be good for a generation, and sea
charts are good enough if you get them updated every year, but stars
can change between one night and the next. And there's no pattern to
it; they can change by a lot, or by a little, which is worse."
There are wildly varying technologies, and species, and you can work
out the nature of the world, and it's all becoming rather enjoyable…
until the author decides that Fun Time Is Over, the narrator's
interest in learning about things is shut down (for his own good), and
he goes away to have an incurious life. After the enjoyable start,
this felt like a slap.
"Xingzhou" by Ng Yi-Sheng: an undeveloped narrator describes his
ancestors: a peasant making it as a rickshaw coolie in the big city, a
demon, a hive intelligence, all in a city paved with stars (literally,
it's painful to walk). Which is fine, but the random throwing in of
recognisable terms and phases from other SF stories is distancing
(Hooloovoo, Slurm, Shoggoths, "I should have recognised your foul
stench"), and the interesting ideas are mostly there for gosh-wow
rather than to be explored.
"Shattered Sidewalks of the Human Heart" by Sam J. Miller has Ann
Darrow, post-King Kong, catching a cab… and why and how the world
ends. I don't love it, but it's powerful and effective.
"Wu Ding's Journey to the West" by Tang Fei has people who live
backwards, and the complexities of forecasting of when a great project
will fall out of disrepair and become usable… but it goes on, and on,
and doesn't get anywhere.
"Flowers on My Face" by Geo-il Bok shows a community of directionless
robots on Ganymede, after the disaster killed all the humans. It's
atmospheric, but has no tension or direction.
"One in a Million" by Rodrigo Juri has a rich kid (constantly
describing themself as "we" for no obvious reason), and a doomed
holiday romance, and the awkward people who fight against paradise
(but there's no reason given other than their awkwardness, no sign
of the shared ideas that would bind them together). Predictable and
drab.
"The Weapons of Wonderland" by Thoraiya Dyer: two separate people
writing to someone who might be able to help them trying to talk her
onto their side, but it's constantly jumping back and forth without
clear signalling of the jumps, and there no sense of wonder about it
all, just grinding "this is how it has to work".
"Tolkien and World War I" by Carrie Sessarego is a much-needed
antidote to the recent film
Tolkien, which
like most depictions of creative people removes all the actual
creativity and claims that everything in Tolkien's books was directly
inspired by events in his life. This piece tries to be a bit more
even-handed.
"Fractal Universes, Serialized Novels, and a Cat: A Conversation with
Yoon Ha Lee" by Chris Urie promotes the upcoming collection
Hexarchate Stories. I grew less interested in Lee as a person as I
read more about him, but I still want to read the collection.
"Byzantium, New York, and Rose Petals: A Conversation with Arkady
Martine" by Chris Urie promotes her first novel A Memory Called
Empire. I doubt I'll want to read it, but at least I know why.
"Editor's Desk: From the Moon to Magazines" by Neil Clarke talks about
two recent anthologies, and the difficulty of having a system in which
people expect short fiction to be free. (With no mention of the
difficulty that the modern SF magazines are not the only short fiction
source that now exists.)
The Miller piece might get a nomination, but this felt like a very
dull issue overall.
Comments on this post are now closed. If you have particular grounds for adding a late comment, comment on a more recent post quoting the URL of this one.