1934 non-fiction, a short look at the writing mindset and how to set
oneself to work.
This is unlike most writing books, in that it has nothing to say
about grammar; or about the shape of a story; or even about how to
sell your work. Rather, it's about the psychology of taking writing
seriously.
That basis of discontent was that the difficulties of the average
student or amateur writer begin long before he has come to the place
where he can benefit by technical instruction in story writing. He
himself is in no position to suspect that truth. If he were able to
discover for himself the reasons for his aridity the chances are
that he would never be found enrolled in any class at all.
But he only vaguely knows that successful writers have overcome the
difficulties which seem almost insuperable to him; he believes that
accepted authors have some magic, or at the very lowest, some trade
secret, which, if he is alert and attentive, he may surprise. He
suspects, further, that the teacher who offers his services knows
that magic, and may drop a word about it which will prove an Open
Sesame to him. In the hope of hearing it, or surprising it, he will
sit doggedly through a series of instructions in story types and
plot forming and technical problems which have no relation to his
own dilemma. He will buy or borrow every book with "fiction" in the
title; he will read any symposium by authors in which they tell
their methods of work.
In almost every case he will be disappointed.
Several of the elements here are familiar from later writing about
writing; specifically, the business of separating the composing-mind
from the editing-mind (Brande, under the influence of Freud,
identifies these with the unconscious and the conscious), and tricks
to get oneself to do the hard work of simply sitting down to write and
not be distracted. Brande goes on to develop theory of a third mode of
thinking, which she calls "genius", and uses principles more familiar
to me from meditation exercises in order to trick it into becoming
active.
Many of the examples, while clearly fresh and contemporary in 1934,
are now largely forgotten. It can be interesting to see which ones
aren't.
Whether it will cause me to get off my arse and do something is an
open question. But it's definitely more interesting than most books
about writing.
Comments on this post are now closed. If you have particular grounds for adding a late comment, comment on a more recent post quoting the URL of this one.