2009 police procedural mystery, tartan noir, fifth in the Logan
McRae series. Someone is attacking Polish immigrants in Aberdeen,
cutting out their eyes and burning the sockets – but taking care to
leave them alive – then sending ranting racist letters to the police…
I enjoyed much of the moment-to-moment stuff in this book: the
individual incidents and how things can go wrong with seemingly
routine jobs, the way one has to decide whether to go into a situation
light (and fast) or heavy (and slow) and how either of them can turn
out to be comprehensively the wrong decision, and so on. McRae is
constantly blamed for everything by his superiors, in what feels more
like a hierarchy of bullies than a working police force. This is what
MacBride has done in several previous novels, and very well.
But the bigger plot didn't convince. Apart from some points of
uncharacteristic stupidity by McRae, it's too bitty, too obviously a
framework on which to string the police bits and the gruesome bits. An
extended trip to Poland, leaving most of the cast behind, doesn't help
much. The characters are fine, and I still like to read about them,
but the story is flat.
And the original case never seemed to be properly resolved. Nyy evtug,
vg'f rfgnoyvfurq gung gur nggnpxf jrer qbar ol n fcrpvsvp crefba
gelvat gb gnxr bire Noreqrra'f haqrejbeyq, svar. Ohg: jul Cbyrf? Jnf
vg ernyyl whfg pbvapvqrapr gung gur svefg svir pevzvanyf jub arrqrq gb
or znqr na rknzcyr bs unccrarq gb or Cbyvfu? Naq vs guvf vf zrnag gb
fraq n zrffntr gb bgure pevzvanyf abg gb zrff jvgu uvz, jul gur
enagvat yrggref, gung znxr vg ybbx gb gur choyvp yvxr frevny enpvfg
nffnhyg? Vs gur pnzcnvta bs greebe vf univat ab rssrpg ba bgure
pevzvanyf, vg'f cbvagyrff; vs vg vf univat na rssrpg, jbeq bhtug gb
trg bhg gb gur yrff eryvnoyr pevzvanyf naq guhf gb gur cbyvpr. Ohg vg
arire qbrf.
What I think MacBride's getting at is that successful police work very
often involves drawing a conclusion from nothing like enough evidence,
and a policeman's therefore having to do that all the time – so it's
not at all surprising that McRae goes off half-cocked on the wrong
track sometimes, because his mindset is about doing a thing now
rather than waiting for more information while someone else is injured
or killed and maybe the bad guys have escaped.
There's another problem with this book: that by the end McRae is
fatally compromised, not just by the alcohol that he's using to deal
with post-traumatic stress but by some of his actions late in the
story. That's not the sort of thing you can just forget about and go
back to doing your job. Some of my reaction to this book will have to
wait until I've read how this is dealt with in the next one.
(Why does nobody ever say to a hostage-taker "Look, if you shoot him,
we'll just shoot you. And you know it. So you can't shoot him and hope
to live, so you aren't going to shoot him. So you might as well just
put the gun down…"?)
Comments on this post are now closed. If you have particular grounds for adding a late comment, comment on a more recent post quoting the URL of this one.