1964 science fiction, re-read. The Fuzzies are legally recognised as
sapient, and that means big changes to the government of Zarathustra.
Which is interesting, but too often dull. The question of the low
Fuzzy birthrate is examined, then solved. The question of their
interaction with humans is solved by quietly declaring them permanent
minor children and making them available for adoption – along with a
reservation for those who don't want to live with humans. And what
happens when a human family gets bored with what (from the examples
given) they clearly regard as a clever pet, or when a Fuzzy changes
its mind about where it wants to live? In theory the adoption agency
can resolve all such problems, but we never see it happen and there's
very little discussion of the possibility. Everyone talks about
"having" a Fuzzy with no thought for the implications of that usage.
Fuzzies in human society have to wear numbered ID discs. Humans don't.
Language is a problem too. When Fuzzies and humans converse, it's
represented as broken English with occasional Fuzzy words, presumably
meant to represent a pidgin. All right, neither side has had time to
learn the other's language very well yet, but that's not how people
speak when they're trying to learn each other's languages; if someone
with minimal English is asking me for directions, something that often
happened when I lived in London, they don't sound like this. This is
more like baby-talk. What's worse, when we get a scene of Fuzzies
conversing with each other in their native language (being listened to
without their knowledge by humans) their speech is represented in the
same crude way. It's another diminution of which Piper seems to be
unaware.
I think Piper is trying to write about the importance of building up
solid institutions in order to be a colonial power well, but he's so
keen to put all the competent people on the side of Good (including
the big enemy from the first book, the former planetary manager, who
is converted to Good by having a Fuzzy of his own) that we don't
really see how the institutions would withstand having someone bad
involved with them. When a huge source of wealth is discovered on the
reservation, there's a brief mention of the idea of simply taking it,
but because they're all good people this soon turns into a way to make
the Native Commission self-funding (and, one suspects, to something
like the Alaska Permanent Fund – not invented in the real world until
rather later – where all the Fuzzies get a stipend).
There isn't much in the way of opposition, though; a criminal plot is
gradually spotted and untangled during the course of the book (ohg jul
tb gb nyy gur gebhoyr bs pngpuvat naq genvavat n Shmml jura lbh pbhyq
whfg unir hfrq bar bs gur qebarf gung ner zrnag gb tb guebhtu gubfr
iragvyngvba qhpgf?), but I never felt any particular sense of threat.
The threats here form a series of small problems rather than one big
one, and that doesn't help to produce any sense of tension. The action
sequence near the end, when the criminal endeavour is finally
resolved, is startling by its contrast to the rest of the book, which
is almost entirely talking.
(And it turns out that the veridicator does after all lead to a police
state, because once someone's been plausibly accused of a crime they
can be questioned under veridication about anything, related to the
accusation or not. Which would be fine in a world other than this one,
where everyone has some secrets they'd rather not come out. Piper
doesn't appear to have noticed this problem, though.)
Comments on this post are now closed. If you have particular grounds for adding a late comment, comment on a more recent post quoting the URL of this one.