2019 space opera, first in a projected series. Haimey Dz is the
engineer on a salvage tug; her latest job uncovers both a terrible
crime, and alien supertech.
So one level of this is space opera of the working-stiffs school:
great big events are happening and our heroine's at the pivotal point
of them, but she's just trying to do the right thing rather than
setting out to be be a hero. At the same time this is a world in which
people can adjust their neurochemistry at will, and there are
questions of what it means to be you… especially if your memories
are also to some extent adjustable.
The thought of being in the same quadrant with an unattended
antimatter bottle gave me an uncomfortable shiver. So I adjusted my
chemistry and stopped thinking about it. Then I had an uncomfortable
shiver about adjusting my chemistry so reflexively. You can't win.
While the main power, the Synarche, does this quite a bit (including
in criminal cases), the Freeporters don't. There's a certain amount of
arguing about freedom versus controlled conformity… all right, there's
quite a bit of this, and it works surprisingly well.
There are people, even now, who manage to elude rightminding to the
point where they enjoy their pleasures more if somebody else suffers
to provide them.
So why didn't I enjoy the book more? I think it's trying to be too
many things; there's the salvage tug story, the universe-changing tech
story, at least two different philosophical arguments, but none of
them really has enough focus. I would say "enough space", but that's
not it; the book is 160,000 words long, which should be plenty of
room. But an awful lot of those words are repetitious, not really
establishing any new points but reinforcing the old. On long flights,
Haimey reads nineteenth-century novels, and finds herself thinking:
They’re great for space travel because they were designed for people
with time on their hands. Middlemarch. Gorgeous, but it just goes on
and on.
…and I got a certain amount of that feeling here too. Furthermore,
Bear admits in an afterword that the book took four years to write,
and there's a lack of precision that kept pushing me away even when
there were interesting things happening.
Singer said, "Government is either imposed with force, or it derives
from the will of the governed. But it's a social contract, right? It
exists simply because people say it does. It's not a thing you can
touch."
"Neither is consciousness," Connla said.
"You're encouraging him," I said. "Fly the tug, so we don't die."
I liked the philosophising, and I liked the action, though as in
dual-narrative stories I found it distracting when asked to switch
from one to the other. I liked the writing, when it got on and did
something.
I tried not to think about the fact that I was eating living animals
and not tank-grown meat. It was a survival situation, my ancestors
(barbarians) had done it for millions of generations, and anyway
they probably had like three ganglia to rub together. The shrimps,
not my ancestors.
All right, Haimey has pretty much the standard personality for female
protagonists these days: practical, tough, snarky, emotional issues,
troubled past. Yes, all right, Mouth in The City in the Middle of the
Night starts in the same place, but Mouth has changed substantially
by the end of the book, and in any case isn't the sole voice; Haimey
reaches some major understandings about herself, but ends up in terms
of personality more or less where she started.
I bumped, got a little magnetism in there to turn off the
inconvenient brain bits for an hour or so, and set a timer lockout
so I couldn't do it again until after the first dose had worn off.
That last part is pretty essential if you're doing this sort of
thing alone, because once you turn off your common sense and ability
to assess consequences, it turns out almost nobody wants them back
again.
It works, mostly, except where it doesn't. If you can just fall into
the writing and come up for air every few hours, that's probably a
better way to read it than my experience of being frequently reminded
that this was a work of fiction that could have used a bit of
editorial distillation. It does at least stand alone and come to a
reasonable conclusion; it was only after I'd finished it that I
discovered that Bear's writing more in this universe.
Comments on this post are now closed. If you have particular grounds for adding a late comment, comment on a more recent post quoting the URL of this one.