2019 fantasy of sorts. The Imperial City has been suddenly besieged,
and its defences will be commanded by Orhan, Colonel of Engineers…
not by his choice.
So there's a lot of Byzantium in the City, and a fair bit of
Rome; Parker had a classical education, and the shreds of recollection
of my own kept trying to tell me that this was a reference to that
thing that I didn't quite remember. And while I suppose one has to
classify this as fantasy since it's clearly not taking place in our
own history, there's no magic, non-human races, or any of the usual
stuff.
There is lots of practical low-tech engineering, but primarily this is
a story about people-management by someone who doesn't regard himself
as a people-manager (but has been forced through circumstance to learn
practical ways of getting them to do what he wants). Orhan is happiest
with technical problems, but he's taken on board a military education,
he's had to be very good in order to overcome the Empire's inherent
racism, and he can see at least a step further ahead than the random
selection of people who happened to be in the City when the siege
started. And he can keep more problems in his mind at once.
She looked at me. "Now that's interesting."
"Keeps me interested all night, when I'd rather be sleeping."
The core question for me was one of motivation. Orhan is a minority in
an Empire that's largely of one race. The Empire has, granted,
grudgingly given him promotions; but it doesn't think much of him, and
he doesn't think a great deal of it. So why does he go back to the
City, given a chance to flee; and why, given more chances to flee
later, does he repeatedly choose to stay and very probably get killed?
He doesn't know. I can't articulate it. But I can feel it, that
sense that you know the right thing to do, and because nobody else
seems to feel that way that means that you simply have to do it. I'm a
bit younger than Parker, but I think a few years ago we'd both have
said (with a touch of embarrassment) that it was an important part of
being properly English. It probably wasn't really true then except for
a particular sort of person, and these days, with so many of our
countrymen abandoning their professed values and turning blatantly
venial the moment it's possible to get away with it, it certainly
isn't.
"You went to a Council meeting in town."
I nodded. "General Priscus and the full dog show."
"And then we do this job a long way away."
"Possibly not far enough," I said.
This is how competence-porn can work well, while remaining deeply
cynical. Oddly enough, I was reminded of the Innkeeper Chronicles
series: when those books get threadbare, they fall into a cycle of a
problem arising and the protagonist solving it. There's some of that
here, but… the protagonist doesn't always have a handy solution, and
sometimes he messes up. Even when he gets something much more right
than anyone expected, he's always focussing on how that's used up
resources or otherwise made things worse for the defenders in other
ways.
There are flaws. There are only three female characters, and none of
them gets more than a basic personality or a very minor role. The
ending is very abrupt and leaves most of the personal stories
unfinished, for all it's the ending that had to happen. Like most of
Parker's work that I've read, the whole thing is relentlessly
depressing, which is fine once in a while but not usually my preferred
mood for reading matter.
But the black humour serves me well in a world that feels as though
it's deliberately stripping itself of everything that makes life worth
living. And the feeling of being the one person who actually has a
clear appreciation of what's going on, and thus ends up having to
organise everyone else, is all too familiar.
Comments on this post are now closed. If you have particular grounds for adding a late comment, comment on a more recent post quoting the URL of this one.