RogerBW's Blog

Why no anti-submarine Osprey? 07 November 2020

When the V-22 Osprey was still in development, one of the major roles it was expected to fill was that of submarine hunting. But this never happened, to the point that it's now largely been forgotten that it was ever contemplated. Why?

Well, why was it wanted? The answer is dipping sonar. A sub-hunting helicopter can hover and lower a sonar transducer into the sea, send out a ping or two and listen to the response, then reel it up, move to a new site, and do the same thing again. But it is intrinsically limited by the transit speed of a helicopter (it would have been replacing the original LAMPS Mk III, on the SH-60B platform, making 146 knots); a number of naval officers I was in correspondence with were very much looking forward to having a dipping sonar that could be moved around a task group rather faster than the helo could manage.

So why didn't it happen? I speculate. A folded SH-60B is 19.7m long by about 3.1m wide (and 5.2m tall); a V-22 can be packed down to 17.5m by 5.6m (and 5.5m tall). That's about 60% more hangar footprint and 80% more width; a frigate that had hangarage for two SH-60s might only be able to fit a single SV-22. (And adding hangar space to an existing ship is hard.)

Well, all right. But you could still fly them off a carrier, right? Yes, but at that point you're committing to developments and updates to two separate ASW helicopters – three, if you also keep the SH-2 for the older frigates – and that starts to bite you in the wallet. So it had better be a really good platform.

One potential problem is that the V-22 is restricted in rotor size: its two 12m-diameter rotors can't be any bigger or they'd collide with the fuselage, so its 19 tons of typical combat mass are hanging off 211m² of rotor disc, 92kg/m². The SH-60 hangs only 8 tons off a single 16m rotor with roughly the same total area, for 38kg/m². That means that a hovering V-22 produces substantially more downwash than the helicopter. Would that produce more hash on the sonar if it were being used near the water surface, enough to make a difference to shallow-water operations? I don't think there are any public data on this, but it's certainly worth considering.

An extra hundred knots and more of speed over the SH-60 wouldn't hurt, though it would be nice to have more; and you could hang a lot of sensor gear on this large aircraft, and maybe even more than the two torpedoes the SH-60 can haul.

Torpedo carriage could be tricky to arrange, but the V-22 as built can be filled with 24 paratroopers who then charge out of it in flight or even fast-rope from the hover, so maintaining balance with a shifting load ought not to be a problem. (This page about a model kit shows one possible way of arranging it, not to mention proving that I didn't just make this up.) Spare weight could go to air-dropped sonobuoys. But unlike the helos you can't have forward-firing (as opposed to dropped) weapons under the wings (because the rotors will sometimes be turned forward), the ground clearance isn't high enough to hang anything substantial under the belly, and there's no provision for a ventral hatch.

So I think in the end what did for the SV-22 is primarily the size of the aircraft, but that was combined with various other advantages not being quite as advantageous as had been hoped.

Comments on this post are now closed. If you have particular grounds for adding a late comment, comment on a more recent post quoting the URL of this one.

Tags 1920s 1930s 1940s 1950s 1960s 1970s 1980s 1990s 2000s 2010s 3d printing action advent of code aeronautics aikakirja anecdote animation anime army astronomy audio audio tech aviation base commerce battletech beer boardgaming book of the week bookmonth chain of command children chris chronicle church of no redeeming virtues cold war comedy computing contemporary cornish smuggler cosmic encounter coup covid-19 crime crystal cthulhu eternal cycling dead of winter doctor who documentary drama driving drone ecchi economics en garde espionage essen 2015 essen 2016 essen 2017 essen 2018 essen 2019 essen 2022 essen 2023 existential risk falklands war fandom fanfic fantasy feminism film firefly first world war flash point flight simulation food garmin drive gazebo genesys geocaching geodata gin gkp gurps gurps 101 gus harpoon historical history horror hugo 2014 hugo 2015 hugo 2016 hugo 2017 hugo 2018 hugo 2019 hugo 2020 hugo 2021 hugo 2022 hugo 2023 hugo 2024 hugo-nebula reread in brief avoid instrumented life javascript julian simpson julie enfield kickstarter kotlin learn to play leaving earth linux liquor lovecraftiana lua mecha men with beards mpd museum music mystery naval noir non-fiction one for the brow opera parody paul temple perl perl weekly challenge photography podcast politics postscript powers prediction privacy project woolsack pyracantha python quantum rail raku ranting raspberry pi reading reading boardgames social real life restaurant reviews romance rpg a day rpgs ruby rust scala science fiction scythe second world war security shipwreck simutrans smartphone south atlantic war squaddies stationery steampunk stuarts suburbia superheroes suspense television the resistance the weekly challenge thirsty meeples thriller tin soldier torg toys trailers travel type 26 type 31 type 45 vietnam war war wargaming weather wives and sweethearts writing about writing x-wing young adult
Special All book reviews, All film reviews
Produced by aikakirja v0.1