2020 SF. Humanity can travel to parallel worlds! But only pretty close
parallels; and the only people who can do it are people whose
other-world counterparts have died. Which means that the high-tech
city has a use for people from the warlord-run town next door…
And it also means that this is in large part a book about how
people might have turned out had their lives been different. While
there is some decent physics-building, that's not what the book is
for, and I think one's meant to ignore the various minor holes
rather than picking at them (for example, the standard
alternate-worlds problem of why there aren't uncounted billions of
worlds imperceptibly different from our own). (Other holes, like "why
do we seem to be the only world that has cross-world travel", are ones
you're meant to pick at because Johnson has an answer to that, so
this is a bit disorientating.)
But the parallel worlds are there mostly to make an effective
background to a story about race/class and how one's previous life
constrains one's thinking in both obvious and inobvious ways, as well
as more directly about the difficulties of someone who looks like an
outsider navigating a society that's mostly quite pleasant to people
who look like its own. Cara, first-person narrator, is a mess, still
making excuses for the abuser she escaped from, angry and scared and
somewhat broken – but not completely. She still has a sense of what's
the right thing to do, even if she's got into the habit of trying to
ignore it. Her flaws make sense based on who she is, rather than being
things pasted onto Generic Heroine to make her more "relatable".
The writing is solid, if sometimes overly portentous ("the first thing
a monster learns is when to lie"), and bad things happen to good
people. But the book avoids being preachy even though it has serious
points to make, and even the Mad-Max-style warlord, horrible person as
he clearly is, is holding together something like a society; it may be
a society that benefits him a whole lot more than it benefits everyone
else, but it's still better than some of the things that might
happen without him. Meanwhile the lone heroic scientist who invented
cross-world travel really doesn't look the same if you don't start off
assuming that the lone heroic scientist must be the protagonist of
the story.
This book does several things I don't like, most obviously in having
relationship drama that could be solved by talking – but both people
involved have reasons not to talk. And its closing paragraph is the
best expression of the solution to the philosophical problem proposed
in All the Myriad Ways that I've ever read. Really very good indeed.
Comments on this post are now closed. If you have particular grounds for adding a late comment, comment on a more recent post quoting the URL of this one.