2018 technothriller. Those sneaky Russians have a new terror weapon,
and only a pre-emptive attack can prevent World War III.
Well, the inspiration is up front: Bond found out about the
putative Status-6
UUV
and decided that all the claims were true. But, as Martin Bourne
points out in his Shipwreck modern naval wargaming rules (the rule
set for this era that isn't written by Bond and Carlson), there's a
basic problem with this model: the people who build a weapon for a
government have an interest in talking it up so that they get more
funding, that government has an interest in talking it up so as to
make it sound more intimidating, and the opposition's intelligence
people have an interest in talking it up so that they get more
resources for their flavour of analysis and countermeasure rather
than some other department's. So every information source available
to mere mortals will tend to make a system sound much more capable and
reliable than it actually is.
But merely being able to vaporise a coastal city with a robotic
submarine isn't enough, so we end up with
Project Dragon, a long-range, nuclear-propelled, nuclear-armed land
attack torpedo system. In Russian terminology, the Dragon was a
deep-sea torpedo-rocket strike complex, a strategic weapon that
combined an incredibly large torpedo with a hypersonic land attack
cruise missile. […] able to reach targets well inland.
and the difficulty is that this never really convinced me. I mean,
even if we assume for the sake of argument that it works, that it is
magically stealthy (the use of "nanomaterial" is a dead giveaway, the
technothriller equivalent of "a wizard did it"), that it actually
can effectively destroy an inland city with only a few minutes'
warning by sneaking up to the coast and firing its missile… that's
just the same capability that ballistic missile submarines have had
since about the 1960s, with depressed-trajectory attacks! (And Larry
and Chris certainly know this.)
And then we're asked to believe on top of that that, because this
weapon is so huge, rather than wait for the submarines that can carry
it to come into service, those sneaky Rooskies are building a launch
complex off the northern Russian coast, 500 feet underwater. So, er,
why can't you just roll one of these things off the dock at
Arkhangelsk? Or drop it off a ship? Seems to me that would be a lot
cheaper and quicker to get into action.
I've gone into the menacing new weapon at some length because in a
book like this the threat has to be a credible one, and I just never
found myself convinced. Which is a shame, because some of the rest is
pretty good; in particular, I enjoyed the intelligence analysis of the
data from various submarine missions to nose around that launch
complex as it's being built, and the decisions about what information
to make public when. The submarine action is decent, but there's
really nothing here that Bond and Carlson haven't done before; because
Jerry Mitchell is the series hero he is required to be Always Right,
everyone who agrees with him is right and everyone who doesn't is
wrong, and I never felt any sense either that he was in danger or that
he might not succeed in every respect.
(Oh yeah, his former CO is now the President. And that's about the
extent of anyone's characterisation.)
It may of course be that I'm just not a person who can enjoy
technothrillers any more, but I've enjoyed others in recent years.
Comments on this post are now closed. If you have particular grounds for adding a late comment, comment on a more recent post quoting the URL of this one.