2001 alternate-history war story, fourth of six books. Belisarius
delays the Malwa's best general in the Zagros Mountains to stop him
reaching Mesopotamia; his wife Antonina forges an alliance with the
Axumites.
It's still a middle volume, but it's a better one compared with
book three. Rather than just another iteration of "they invaded and we
stopped them", there's a deliberate call forward to Stalingrad (which
Belisarius knows about thanks to his ally from the future): with a
particular army destroyed, this will be the Malwa's high point, and
the rest of the war will be beating them back. (One suspects it's more
from the carnage wreaked on their logistics trains then from the
actual battles.)
All right, it could still be summarised as "the good guys win"; that's
just what this series is about. The Malwa's two smart generals are
back, and working together, but even that isn't enough to out-think
Belisarius, and indeed he ends up getting one of them to think that he
could start a coup at home. Also, lots of new relationships get
started, because everyone must be paired off (though usually that sort
of thing gets left to the final book). In general there's more
politics and less battle than before, no bad thing since every battle
still ends with "good guys win" and there's more room for subtlety in
politics.
I think there's a misinterpretation of the qanat system (my
understanding is that the vertical shafts that link to the sloping
tunnels are for maintenance, rather than in regular use as wells, not
that this affects the plot), and obviously the authors' fingers are
very much on the scales, but mostly there's still a sense of fun here.
Volume four of six obviously isn't the place to start, but while it's
essentially the recipe as before there's enough changed to keep things
interesting.
- Posted by J Michael Cule at
11:59am on
14 December 2021
Gosh, did that series really come out twenty years ago?
I feel old.
I can also report that after a while all mil-sf/fantasy tends to blend into one eminently skippable generic narrative. While Hornblower and Maturin remain clear in my mind the space battle and alternate history slaughters get mulched together as they decay.
This may be due to my having read the naval sagas when I was younger of course.
- Posted by RogerBW at
12:43pm on
14 December 2021
"Twenty years ago? Nonsense, it was in 2001. Oh."
To me good milfic (i.e. milfic that I like; I'm not pretending to set standards for anyone else here) is primarily about the people, like any good fiction. It's about the people in military situations, sure, but it's that person's experience of that situation, whether we're looking at a grunt in the trenches or the greatest general in the world winning a battle.
So one could write a fictional treatment of the Battle of Jutland, say, but to appeal to me it would have to start with an interesting character – rather than making up random flat characters as an excuse to regurgitate one's research. If I want the raw facts I'll read an actual history book. I don't want the raw facts about unreal history: I want to know how the people react when they learn the facts.
- Posted by Dr Bob at
04:53pm on
14 December 2021
I'm with Roger. I'd read some milfic when young and dismissed the genre for years because it was all cardboard characters and info dumps of ballistics porn.
Then I read a short story by Harold Coyle and went "Hang on, this has actual people in it!". So I picked up a novel of his from the local bookshop (one of the early Scott Dixon ones), and loved the way that there were viewpoint characters from all sides in the conflict, and all of them thought they were doing the right thing.
Comments on this post are now closed. If you have particular grounds for adding a late comment, comment on a more recent post quoting the URL of this one.