1954 non-fiction. Molly Lefebure was a junior reporter who took a job
as secretary to Keith Simpson, the Supervisor of Medico-Legal
Post-Mortems and the forensic pathologist most often consulted by the
Metropolitan Police. Reissued in 1990 as Murder on the Home Front.
There's a great deal of fascinating stuff here, on several
levels. Lefebure was probably the first woman to work in an English
mortuary, and this is autobiography as well as recollection: various
friends thought the work clearly too horrible for words, and
"secretary" meant not only taking shorthand dictation over a corpse in
the dissecting-room but going to crime scenes and gathering evidence.
(She points out what should be a surprise to nobody, that her female
friends were thoroughly ghoulish right up to the point at which a man
came into the room, at which they became pink and fluffy.)
The actual crimes are surprisingly mundane even by the standards of
the day: yes, one is aware that most murder is done as an escalation
of existing tensions and by the most obvious person, but it's very
much reinforced here, with every murdered woman in particular quite
clearly shown to have been killed by husband or boyfriend. Yes,
McKinstry the Canadian soldier who (probably) half-strangled Peggy
Richards and threw her off the not-yet-open Waterloo Bridge should
have taken care not to be seen leaving a pub with her; but at that
point he wasn't planning to kill her, and the argument started
later.
Some of the cases are technically interesting – in particular the
Dobkin case, with a body part-burned and buried in slaked lime, oh
dear someone didn't know his Crippen, and hidden in a bombed-out
chapel in Kennington presumably in the hope that it would be mistaken
for a victim of the bombing. (But the husband was a firewatcher, and
the chapel was next door to his post…)
There's also a hefty dose of the attitudes of the time. (We are told
that "some passages have been edited for this edition".) Reading
elsewhere suggests that Simpson was entirely in favour of legal
abortion, perhaps since he so often met the results of its illegality,
but regarded homosexuals as perverts who should just stop doing that
and then everything would be all right. Meanwhile Lefebure, who
certainly wasn't of the upper crust but was able to indulge in
rock-climbing and riding to hounds, is stunned by the poverty she
encounters. She likes fresh air, and despises the warm fug in which
poor people apparently like to live. (Well, fresh air is all very
well, but re-heating a cold house costs money you don't have…) One
almost pictures her asking "but have you tried not being poor?" – in
keeping with the common attitude of the times, she sees an
individual's problems as that individual's problems, rather than
considering how the person might have got into that situation. More
generally she knows deep in her bones that there's a right way and a
wrong way to live, and it's basically the same way for everyone.
On the other hand, she's clearly sidling up towards finding the death
penalty barbaric, regarding the contemporaneous system of executions
taking place within prisons attended only by professionals as far
superior to the historical spectacles of Tyburn, and:
I have sometimes thought that if murderers were not hanged the
public would not take such a bloodthirsty interest in the subject of
murder, and that if public excitement were not so intense there
would not be so many murders.
A fascinating book, recommended for period detail.
Comments on this post are now closed. If you have particular grounds for adding a late comment, comment on a more recent post quoting the URL of this one.