1982 detective fiction, second and last of James's novels of Cordelia
Gray, private investigator. The fading actress Clarissa Lisle has been
getting subtle threats against her life; Cordelia's employed by her
(fourth) husband to look into it. This will not end well.
Of course it won't; this is a James book, and the only virtue in
nobody going away happy is that one wouldn't want happiness for most
of the characters anyway. But while things do rather pick up once the
action moves to the isolated castle that's the primary setting,
James's usual obsessions have to be got through first. It's not class
prejudice exactly, as much as a firm assurance that anyone who doesn't
do things exactly the way she does them (i.e. the right way) is
wrong, and stupid, and ought to know better. It's clear, for example,
that women who don't have dress sense or beauty shouldn't try to look
pretty; they should instead just vanish from sight. Of course this
applies to books too.
You could, she supposed, call it a crime novel with a difference,
the difference being that there had been more sex, normal and
abnormal, than detection and that the book had attempted with some
success to combine the popular family saga with the mystery. The
writing style had been nicely judged for the mass market, neither
good enough to jeopardize popular appeal nor bad enough to make
people ashamed of being seen reading it in public.
And furniture.
[…] the store in Kilburn which sold cheap plywood furniture on hire
purchase to customers too ignorant to know when they were being
cheated or too proud in their poverty to rummage round the street
markets and buy good solid oak, second-hand. The stuff he dazzled
them with, cocktail cabinets, room dividers, ornate suites would
fall or be kicked to pieces long before they'd finished paying for
it.
And everything else. But once the obligatory ranting is out of the
way, things perk up a bit; the writing, granted, exists mostly to show
off how horrible all the characters are, presumably in case one might
accidentally find oneself caring about what happened to them. Get over
that hump, and it's quite fun: grisly murder, no obvious motive (but
plenty of people who disliked the victim quite a lot), and everyone's
interlocking obsessions and neuroses and deceptions will bring at
least some of them to a bad end.
Yes, yes, Cordelia's quite wet, and everyone's attitudes are more
1950s than 1970s. But there's an isolated house and a sinister butler,
and amateur theatricals have a significant place in the plot, in a way
that makes it clear that James is deliberately playing with the
toolbox of pre-war mysteries, and with some respect rather than just
tipping it out onto the floor. Yes, James spends long paragraphs on
the decoration of a room or people being pointlessly vile to each
other, but they are at least well-written paragraphs, and the mystery
even makes some degree of sense even though all the necessary clues
are held back to the last possible moment. I don't suppose I shall
ever be a James fan, but I ended up enjoying this much more than I
thought I should from the early chapters.
Comments on this post are now closed. If you have particular grounds for adding a late comment, comment on a more recent post quoting the URL of this one.