2022 romance. Nora Stephens is the other woman, the city-living
partner who gets dumped after the man in her life has a life-changing
rural experience. Until her sister takes her on a rural experience of
her own…
I love the conceit here. Romances, and especially romantic
comedies, often start with one or the other partner in a bad
relationship which they'll have to get out of, and that person is
usually dropped from the narrative, or given parody villain traits so
that the reader doesn't mind that they're being left alone. But for
them to work as credible opposition, they have to be people too, and
one wonders what they're like when they aren't being The Future Ex.
And that's fine, but there are enough other complications in Nora's
life that this doesn't seem quite the full answer to that question
that it could have been. Nora has a sister, and for years since the
death of their mother has been The Responsible One; but that isn't a
sustainable relationship in the long term, and it's good to see that
acknowledged and resolved. She has a lot of history that affects her
in the present, and so does her potential partner Charlie. In making
these people specific and individual, I think Henry gave up the
opportunity to write the definitive book about the Other Woman
archetype… but I find I don't mind.
There's banter; more to the point, there's banter that makes sense for
these people in these situation, rather than being generically snappy
dialogue. There are wants that are unacknowledged until they suddenly
break open and affect everything. There's communication, and a
welcome lack of Big Misunderstandings that would be trivially solved
if only the principals would talk. (Though there's a bit of that in
another relationship.) There are parents who are good but not perfect,
who have more to them than simply to be the loving example of what the
principals' relationship could become.
Too many stories see someone who's particular about they way they live
their life as someone who needs to "relax", to get their horizons
broadened by a manic pixie dream girl, etc.. I'm sure some of them do.
But actually a lot of grown-ups have in fact established their
preferences, and have good reasons for them, and don't do any harm by
them, and I'm very pleased to see this book acknowledging that.
There are plenty of small niggles, and I didn't quite end up loving
it, but this was still highly enjoyable and I'd recommend it with only
slight caution.
Comments on this post are now closed. If you have particular grounds for adding a late comment, comment on a more recent post quoting the URL of this one.