2016 alternate-world fantasy, third of its series. The Library is
under attack!
…and that really shouldn't be dull. I don't know what it is
about this series, but I find Irene unlikeable, not to mention
monotonous in charging off into danger without a plan while refusing
the help of her friends. All right, it's better when she finally
realises that if she's in a tricky situation on her own she ought to
take charge and do something about it rather than wait for someone
else to bail her out… but she made that same transition last book, and
I don't feel I need another half a book of wet flapping Irene before
she finally does her job.
‘Darling, he’s going to kill me.’ Zayanna was apparently calm now, but
Irene had the impression of a lid hastily nailed down over a seething
cauldron of panic. ‘And you too, but frankly I’m more worried about
me. Do something!’
I must assume it's deliberate on Cogman's part that the management of
the Library really doesn't look like much of a good guy here, even if
the people trying to change it are presented as opportunistic nitwits.
(Nobody else comes out well either.) Why do I care about these people?
Oh look here's an abortive attempt at progress on the romance subplot
that's been sitting since book one, and nothing happens.
There is of course The Language, a way of controlling reality, but
like bad fantasy magic it feels super-powerful but mysteriously
restricted by the author from being as useful as it should be. When
Cogman runs out of other ideas, The Language can solve it. Otherwise,
it won't work because (doubletalk) and it's time to do something else.
Perhaps I'm irked because Cogman killed off my favourite character
from the series (not just the one I liked best, the one who seemed
most interesting and with the greatest sense of enthusiasm for this
wondrous universe in which they're all living). Or because Verar'f
hygvzngr fbyhgvba gb gur nggnpx ba gur Yvoenel vf gb qrfgebl pbhagyrff
havdhr obbxf, and while she has a few qualms about it she never
seriously considers any other way of dealing with the problem – and at
a meta level, that's not the sort of action I want to see in my story
about heroic book-lovers.
Indeed, the series was presented to me as "heroic book-lovers work to
save the universe", and it's coming out more as "incompetent book
thieves work for the self-interest of their shadowy masters".
Comments on this post are now closed. If you have particular grounds for adding a late comment, comment on a more recent post quoting the URL of this one.