RogerBW's Blog

Jurassic Park 16 March 2024

1993 science fiction, dir. Steven Spielberg, Sam Neill, Laura Dern: IMDb / allmovie. How dare they do science!

At the core, this is a very Michael Crichton story. Science is Bad because they didn't ask Michael Crichton (other arbiters of morality may be available) whether something was a good idea before doing it. Also chaos theory blah blah. But there is a thick layer of Spielberg over the top to make the polemic palatable.

This was the film Spielberg was editing while he was shooting Schindler's List; the studio demanded he do something commercial as the price of making the serious film. He later said he'd used "every ounce of intuition on Schindler's List and every ounce of craft on Jurassic Park", and I'd agree that this is a very craft film; every image and sound (oh hello again John Williams) has been carefully set up to produce exactly this emotional response at that instant.

I find that over the years I have been sensitised to this sort of thing, and when I feel it being done to me, I resent it. So when we're introduced to Grant at his dig site, almost the first thing we learn about him is that he Doesn't Like Children; and my immediate response was "oh, right, that's going to be cured". Ellie is Caring and Motherly. Moppets gonna moppet.

But really the Spielberg gets thinnest when Ian Malcolm is on screen. Jeff Goldblum does a game job, but his character is a walking author's message whose job is to be right (but ignored). "You read what others had done, and you took the next step." Yes, that's how science works, you don't actually have to start with putting rocks on other rocks every time you do something. It's a bad idea to bring dinosaurs back because "Nature selected them for extinction"? What sort of pseudo-religious thinking is this?

Though of course I'm biased because like many people I've met the white man who has social capital by virtue of also being good at something that makes money, so that he can express contempt for social skills and get away with thinking of nobody but himself. We've got too many of these people in real life as well as in books and films.

"They're just animals. They're herbivores." Ever met an angry bull?

But ignore the cardboard characters and the preaching, and the effects are great. Not accurate even by the standards of the day; as usual, accuracy was sacrificed for something the boss thought would look better. But we do at least get fast-moving dinosairs rather than ponderous lumps, and each species' introduction (Spielberg's craft, Spielberg's craft) is arranged to set up the audience to be awed, terrified, sympathetic, etc. as the film demands.

I didn't like this film, but I have to admit it's superbly made. I have a black and clinkered heart, and I wasn't moved the way I was meant to be; given how much people raved over this at the time I had expected a whole lot more. There isn't even a post-credits sting.

I talk about this film further on Ribbon of Memes.


  1. Posted by Ashley R Pollard at 10:22am on 16 March 2024

    I liked this film despite its faults, and is one of enjoyable re-watch movies.

    However, I agree with you, Michael Crichton sucks as an SF author. Not his writing ability, which demonstrates craft, but his anti-science morality.

    I'm with you there on the protest march with a banner saying so. I'd even go so far to say that SF that is anti-science isn't SF, but rather preaching to those who resent change because they can't cope with any challenge to the status quo.

  2. Posted by John Dallman at 11:02am on 16 March 2024

    The craft did not entirely work for me. Flying the helicopter so low in the introductory scenes, purely for the sake of the whoosh, broke my disbelief-suspenders: a large and well-run project is being portrayed, and a properly trained pilot would not do that, purely on safety grounds.

    I found I could see the procedural generation in some of the CGI - my vision is weird, and I knew a fair bit about it by the standards of the time.

    It wasn't good SF, just an overgrown Saturday morning show.

  3. Posted by RogerBW at 04:14pm on 18 March 2024

    The helicopter shenanigan that stuck me most was the vertical descent, down a narrow canyon perhaps 4× the width of the helicopter, to the landing pad. That's a clear invitation to vortex ring state (at which point the thing just drops out of the air) and I can't believe that anyone competent would put the landing pad there in the first place. And this is supposed to be opened to tourism? (If things have to be down there, put the pad on top of the canyon wall and install a lift! It'll be cheaper than paying for all those lost helicopters and pilots will still work for you.)

    (I assume the actual canyon was rather wider than it looks in the shot, or even film pilots might have objected to doing it.)

    The bits of this that work best for me are where it imitates a disaster film (but with dinosaurs rather than an ocean liner or a burning high-rise).

Comments on this post are now closed. If you have particular grounds for adding a late comment, comment on a more recent post quoting the URL of this one.

Search
Archive
Tags 1920s 1930s 1940s 1950s 1960s 1970s 1980s 1990s 2000s 2010s 2300ad 3d printing action advent of code aeronautics aikakirja anecdote animation anime army astronomy audio audio tech base commerce battletech bayern beer boardgaming book of the week bookmonth chain of command children chris chronicle church of no redeeming virtues cold war comedy computing contemporary cornish smuggler cosmic encounter coup covid-19 crime crystal cthulhu eternal cycling dead of winter doctor who documentary drama driving drone ecchi economics en garde espionage essen 2015 essen 2016 essen 2017 essen 2018 essen 2019 essen 2022 essen 2023 essen 2024 existential risk falklands war fandom fanfic fantasy feminism film firefly first world war flash point flight simulation food garmin drive gazebo genesys geocaching geodata gin gkp gurps gurps 101 gus harpoon historical history horror hugo 2014 hugo 2015 hugo 2016 hugo 2017 hugo 2018 hugo 2019 hugo 2020 hugo 2021 hugo 2022 hugo 2023 hugo 2024 hugo-nebula reread in brief avoid instrumented life javascript julian simpson julie enfield kickstarter kotlin learn to play leaving earth linux liquor lovecraftiana lua mecha men with beards mpd museum music mystery naval noir non-fiction one for the brow opera parody paul temple perl perl weekly challenge photography podcast politics postscript powers prediction privacy project woolsack pyracantha python quantum rail raku ranting raspberry pi reading reading boardgames social real life restaurant reviews romance rpg a day rpgs ruby rust scala science fiction scythe second world war security shipwreck simutrans smartphone south atlantic war squaddies stationery steampunk stuarts suburbia superheroes suspense television the resistance the weekly challenge thirsty meeples thriller tin soldier torg toys trailers travel type 26 type 31 type 45 vietnam war war wargaming weather wives and sweethearts writing about writing x-wing young adult
Special All book reviews, All film reviews
Produced by aikakirja v0.1