2021 historical mystery; third in Baker's Anna Fairweather series
(1920s amateur detection). Mrs Montford is having her portrait
painted. At the end of the session, she sends Anna after the painter
to change an appointment; Anna's just in time to see him stabbed in
the street.
This felt repetitious. The basic idea is that Anna doesn't want
to be an investigator, and tries to avoid getting involved with the
murders she keeps witnessing, but somehow collects all the evidence
anyway.
The thing is, this series premise robs the story of its character
motivations. In a standard mystery the investigator, amateur or
professional, is driven to find out what happened and bring a killer
to justice, whether from duty, friendship with the deceased, fear for
their own life, or whatever else. But Anna doesn't have any of those
motives; she'd be quite happy to leave it all to the police, and so
there has to be a series of coincidences to bring more evidence to her
attention. All of which makes her a very passive protagonist.
And for a third time in three books Anna comes to work out what's
happened while in conversation with the murderer, who realises and
attacks her. Which I suppose is the only way to bring on a resolution
other than telling the police and letting them resolve everything, but
that would at least be a bit of variation (and I've seen it work in
other mysteries).
There's also a carefully rationed series of revelations about Anna's
past, and a very slow romance, which are meant to provide the series'
long-term interest: why did Colonel Montford hire Anna out of the
orphanage? What really happened to her father? For the full answer, I
assume, we have to wait until book 6. But I find myself lacking any
enthusiasm for the process of getting there.
I liked the first book, but it seems to have been one of a kind.
Series abandoned.
Comments on this post are now closed. If you have particular grounds for adding a late comment, comment on a more recent post quoting the URL of this one.