RogerBW's Blog

The Blair Witch Project (1999) 26 March 2025

1999 found-footage horror, dir. Daniel Myrick and Eduardo Sánchez, Heather Donahue; IMDb / allmovie. Three filmmakers enter, no filmmakers leave.

This certainly wasn't the first film to use the conceit of film found after the death or disappearance of the cast and crew; Shirley Clarke's The Conversation came out in 1961 to admittedly small audiences. and_Cannibal Holocaust_ made a thing of it as a substrate for horror in 1980. (And in those days it was easier to start plausible rumours that it was a snuff film, or that the director had been charged with murder.)

But handheld video cameras had come along by 1999, and videotape can be reused; so without the cost of film it's more plausible here that there could be casual video recordings of any moments the crew feels might be worth documenting, as well as the actual filmed material that was supposedly to go into the documentary that's the film-within-film excuse for all this to be happening..

Of course, it's also much cheaper to film this style than a "real" film: get some first-time actors and dump them in front of the camera, telling them to improvise round a minimal outline rather than a fully-written script. No need to employ expensive cinematographers or lighting techs! As with the slasher films that followed Halloween, every low-budget filmmaker and his dog copied this in the next few years, while not copying the behind-the-scenes effort that went into making this, if not to my mind good, at least watchable. (Such as giving the cast instructions for a day's filming only on that day, to keep their reactions fairly naturalistic.)

Is this about a witch or about a serial killer? Nobody knows, and nobody cares. It's horror glurge: creepy things happen, and if you aren't impressed, don't worry, another creepy thing will happen in a moment. This is to my mind one of the defining points of the strain in horror fiction that I mentally label uninterested: nobody here is curious to know what's actually going on, they just want to survive, even though knowing what's going on might help them to survive.

But my goodness they are annoying. I never felt I'd got to know anything about these people, or had any reason to care for them beyond their being notional human beings. Heather's big confession should be a dramatic and sad moment, the real climax of the film, but instead it's just dull. Don't worry. someone's gonna die soon.

When my wife saw this at a student union film clib, someone called out "just follow the river, idiots". But as we see it, they could just be that incompetent; if they followed the river and still got back to the same place, that would be a genuinely scary moment, but it would also be real evidence of a supernatural happening.

What found footage also lets you do, of course, is have even less narrative connection than film normally gets away with. This is obviously deliberate; but I come to films for story and character, and in both respects I felt cheated.

I talk about this film further on Ribbon of Memes.

See also:
Halloween (1978)


  1. Posted by DrBob at 11:31am on 26 March 2025

    I hate this movie with a passion. I went to see it because a friend told me it was the greatest (and scariest) film ever. I was bored witless. It finally started to get interesting... and then ended 5 minutes later. Three cretins more deserving to die in the woods I have never seen in a film. Water flows downhill! There is only one river on the map you are using! I also hated it because I worked in TV and kept thinking things like "Well the reason you've run out of cigarettes is because that rucksack must be jammed full of film cans and videotapes, so there's no room for ciggies". The bit where 2 of them are having an argument with the 3rd filming it... then one of the 2 picks up a camera so there's footage of person 3 joining the argument... no, no, no! Human beings arguing do not pause to film someone else!

  2. Posted by chris at 12:50pm on 26 March 2025

    Luckily, since I saw it shortly after it came out and therefore when it was still being talked about, I did not feel in the least cheated: I had no expectations in the first place.

    My main reaction was "goodness, don't they know any more interesting swear-words than THAT? What boring little people. And what on earth will they have left to say if something does suddenly rise up and rend them limb from limb, now they have used up the only emphatic they know?"

  3. Posted by RogerBW at 02:58pm on 26 March 2025

    As far as I recall, mostly "gluk" as the camera cuts out.

  4. Posted by Robert at 05:03pm on 27 March 2025

    My memories of this are entirely bound up in the spectacle of the event.

    I saw it in a crowded theatre the week it came out at the insistence of friends with a large group of friends.

    It was a boring watch and it was dumb and “follow the river” and “maybe just burn the house” were expressed among my friends as it was watched.

    All that said the atmosphere in the theatre was genuinely tense in a way I’ve never experienced before or since and quite a number of folks were genuinely shaken as they left the theatre.

    I can’t imagine anyone ever wanting to re-watch it and the effect of the film on people I knew well absolutely puzzled me.

Add A Comment

Your Name
Your Email
Your Comment

Note that I will only approve comments that relate to the blog post itself, not ones that relate only to previous comments. This is to ensure that the blog remains outside the scope of the UK's Online Safety Act (2023).

Your submission will be ignored if any field is left blank, but your email address will not be displayed. Comments will be processed through markdown.

Search
Archive
Tags 1920s 1930s 1940s 1950s 1960s 1970s 1980s 1990s 2000s 2010s 2300ad 3d printing action advent of code aeronautics aikakirja anecdote animation anime army astronomy audio audio tech base commerce battletech bayern beer boardgaming book of the week bookmonth chain of command children chris chronicle church of no redeeming virtues cold war comedy computing contemporary cornish smuggler cosmic encounter coup covid-19 crime crystal cthulhu eternal cycling dead of winter disaster doctor who documentary drama driving drone ecchi economics en garde espionage essen 2015 essen 2016 essen 2017 essen 2018 essen 2019 essen 2022 essen 2023 essen 2024 existential risk falklands war fandom fanfic fantasy feminism film firefly first world war flash point flight simulation food garmin drive gazebo genesys geocaching geodata gin gkp gurps gurps 101 gus harpoon historical history horror hugo 2014 hugo 2015 hugo 2016 hugo 2017 hugo 2018 hugo 2019 hugo 2020 hugo 2021 hugo 2022 hugo 2023 hugo 2024 hugo-nebula reread in brief avoid instrumented life javascript julian simpson julie enfield kickstarter kotlin learn to play leaving earth linux liquor lovecraftiana lua mecha men with beards mpd museum music mystery naval noir non-fiction one for the brow opera parody paul temple perl perl weekly challenge photography podcast politics postscript powers prediction privacy project woolsack pyracantha python quantum rail raku ranting raspberry pi reading reading boardgames social real life restaurant review reviews romance rpg a day rpgs ruby rust scala science fiction scythe second world war security shipwreck simutrans smartphone south atlantic war squaddies stationery steampunk stuarts suburbia superheroes suspense television the resistance the weekly challenge thirsty meeples thriller tin soldier torg toys trailers travel type 26 type 31 type 45 vietnam war war wargaming weather wives and sweethearts writing about writing x-wing young adult
Special All book reviews, All film reviews
Produced by aikakirja v0.1