RogerBW's Blog

Top Gun Maverick (2022) 27 October 2025

2022 action, dir. Joseph Kosinski, Tom Cruise, Tom Cruise's Ego; IMDb / allmovie. He's back and he has learned nothing.

36 years is nothing like the record gap between a film and its sequel. (I think, outside pure animation, that may be the 54 years from Mary Poppins to Mary Poppins Returns.) But, assuming the character is meant to be about as old as the actor, yer man Maverick is 23 in Top Gun and 59 here. And I don't care how great your personal exercise routine is or how much you've stretched your skin over your bones, when you're 59 some things don't work as well as they used to. Many of those things are exactly what high-performance flying demands, whether that's test piloting or combat.

But Charles Parnell is here! And Jon Hamm! And the nostalgia played REALLY LOUD can you hear it now grandpa?

There is very little point to a combat aircraft flying at mach 10, given how much else you have to compromise to make that happen. But that's this film in miniature: the main plot does the same thing, setting up a desperately contrived threat scenario in order to make Our Hero look good even in a world that has terrain-following missiles. (Which, in the real world, don't rely on external navigation aids.)

The presence of F-14s among the enemy aircraft says explicitly that this power is, or is on really good terms with, Iran. Not mentioned of course.

At 8 gravities your aorta is at grave risk of tearing loose from your heart. Especially if it's a sudden 8-g pull-up, which will also knock you out. Especially if you're 59 years old. But that's OK, American Grit will overcome it all.

But this film's real problem is that it throws away all its tension when it makes it clear that the other air crews are safe. Rooster's not going to die because he's part of Tom's redemption arc. Maverick's not going to die because he's played by Tom.

If you have nothing to say, say it REALLY LOUDLY.

I talk about this film further on Ribbon of Memes.


  1. Posted by DrBob at 02:09pm on 27 October 2025

    Partway through this film when they are practicing the canyon run to bullseye the exhaust port (or whatever), I remarked to my mate James: "Isn't this the plot of Star Wars?"

    Also I really, really wanted them to get to the target just in time to see one of Ed Harris' high altitude drones take it out. :-)

  2. Posted by John P at 12:33am on 28 October 2025

    But it's the Star Wars mission - fly fighters down a narrow valley then drop a missile down a tiny vent at the end of it to make the target go boom. Really? Couldn't they do better than that? And they're racing down this twisty valley but still have time to look up and see the warhead of a SAM pass lazily by them. WTF?!?! Even if the big SAM's up top couldn't get in the valley, you'd just stuff it full of AAA and guys with MANPADs instead. This thing is just so c*** on so many levels. It makes the end credits the most watchable bit.

  3. Posted by John P at 06:17pm on 28 October 2025

    "I say we take off and nuke the site from orbit. It's the only way to be sure."

Add A Comment

Your Name
Your Email
Your Comment

Note that I will only approve comments that relate to the blog post itself, not ones that relate only to previous comments. This is to ensure that the blog remains outside the scope of the UK's Online Safety Act (2023).

Your submission will be ignored if any field is left blank, but your email address will not be displayed. Comments will be processed through markdown.

Search
Archive
Tags 1920s 1930s 1940s 1950s 1960s 1970s 1980s 1990s 2000s 2010s 2300ad 3d printing action advent of code aeronautics aikakirja anecdote animation anime army astronomy audio audio tech base commerce battletech bayern beer boardgaming book of the week bookmonth chain of command children chris chronicle church of no redeeming virtues cold war comedy computing contemporary cornish smuggler cosmic encounter coup covid-19 crime crystal cthulhu eternal cycling dead of winter disaster doctor who documentary drama driving drone ecchi economics en garde espionage essen 2015 essen 2016 essen 2017 essen 2018 essen 2019 essen 2022 essen 2023 essen 2024 essen 2025 existential risk falklands war fandom fanfic fantasy feminism film firefly first world war flash point flight simulation food garmin drive gazebo genesys geocaching geodata gin gkp gurps gurps 101 gus harpoon historical history horror horrorm science fiction hugo 2014 hugo 2015 hugo 2016 hugo 2017 hugo 2018 hugo 2019 hugo 2020 hugo 2021 hugo 2022 hugo 2023 hugo 2024 hugo 2025 hugo-nebula reread in brief avoid instrumented life javascript julian simpson julie enfield kickstarter kotlin learn to play leaving earth linux liquor lovecraftiana lua mecha men with beards mpd museum music mystery naval noir non-fiction one for the brow openscad opera parody paul temple perl perl weekly challenge photography podcast poetry politics postscript powers prediction privacy project woolsack pyracantha python quantum rail raku ranting raspberry pi reading reading boardgames social real life restaurant review reviews romance rpg a day rpgs ruby rust scala science fiction scythe second world war security shipwreck simutrans smartphone south atlantic war squaddies stationery steampunk stuarts suburbia superheroes suspense television the resistance the weekly challenge thirsty meeples thriller tin soldier torg toys trailers travel type 26 type 31 type 45 typst vietnam war war wargaming weather wives and sweethearts writing about writing x-wing young adult
Special All book reviews, All film reviews
Produced by aikakirja v0.1