RogerBW's Blog

Extension tubes 13 September 2017

Thanks to a blog reader, I borrowed some more macro equipment.

This time I used an actual scale; here's a wooden ruler, numbered in cm, mm graduations. This uses the 14-45 kit lens, zoomed in to 45mm, as do most of the following. 41 pixels/mm.

With the 16mm extension tube (from a Kenko DG extension tube set). I had to lift the ruler off the table. 95 pixels/mm.

With the +10 macro lens, lifted again. I think the lens photo looks sharper than the tube one, though there's no particular reason why that should happen. 78 pixels/mm.

The full 26mm of tube. 150 pixels/mm.

+17 dioptres of macro lens plus 26mm of tube on the 45mm. This actually works surprisingly well. 195 pixels/mm.

Everything! +17 dioptres of macro lens, 26mm of tube, and 200mm main lens. (I was moving the subject to try to get it in something like focus. With a more flexible tripod system so that both camera and subject could be braced at the right distance from each other, this would probably work better.) 857 pixels/mm. Which is scarily close to optical limits: visible light wavelengths are conventionally 400-700nm, so there are only about 1½ to 3 wavelengths per pixel here.

Compared with the lenses, the tubes are about as bulky to store, quicker to get on and off (I'm very impressed with the manufacturing quality), but don't seem to be any better in terms of image quality. The lenses are more flexible, since there are four of them, and explore the lower-magnification side of things more effectively. The tubes are also about five times the price of the lenses; oh well.

[Buy this at Amazon] and help support the blog.

  1. Posted by Owen Smith at 02:29pm on 13 September 2017

    They're my extension tubes, and I didn't pay Amazon's £100 price. I'm sure they were more like £60, I bought them from an online photographic specialist retailer though I can't remember which one.

    There is a reason the extra lenses might be sharper than the extension tube for the same magnification (you actually used a bit less magnification with the lenses). As I commented on your last blog post on this, Micro Four Thirds lenses are not geometrically correct and the camera corrects for that plus chromatic aberrations in software. The camera still thinks you are at 45mm focal length, but it's all thrown off by the extension tube so the edges of the sensor are seeing light from nearer the middle of the lens than they would normally and the camera is still applying the corrections for the edge of the lens. How much that matters I don't know.

    The add on macro lenses by contrast still have the light from the main lens striking the parts of the sensor that they are supposed to so the right corrections are applied, just nothing extra is being applied for the macro lens.

    I note neither Panasonic nor Olympus sell extension tubes for Micro Four Thirds. This potential problem with the software corrections may be why. Either that or they'd rather sell you a macro lens at more cost and profit than a set of extension tubes.

    I agree the mechanics of these extension tubes feels exceptionally good. I found no looseness of the entire combo, even with both tubes mounted and a big lens.

Comments on this post are now closed. If you have particular grounds for adding a late comment, comment on a more recent post quoting the URL of this one.

Tags 1920s 1930s 1940s 1950s 1960s 1970s 1980s 1990s 2000s 2010s 3d printing action advent of code aeronautics aikakirja anecdote animation anime army astronomy audio audio tech aviation base commerce battletech beer boardgaming book of the week bookmonth chain of command children chris chronicle church of no redeeming virtues cold war comedy computing contemporary cornish smuggler cosmic encounter coup covid-19 crime cthulhu eternal cycling dead of winter doctor who documentary drama driving drone ecchi economics espionage essen 2015 essen 2016 essen 2017 essen 2018 essen 2019 essen 2022 existential risk falklands war fandom fanfic fantasy feminism film firefly first world war flash point flight simulation food garmin drive gazebo genesys geocaching geodata gin gkp gurps gurps 101 gus harpoon historical history horror hugo 2014 hugo 2015 hugo 2016 hugo 2017 hugo 2018 hugo 2019 hugo 2020 hugo 2022 hugo-nebula reread in brief avoid instrumented life javascript julian simpson julie enfield kickstarter kotlin learn to play leaving earth linux liquor lovecraftiana lua mecha men with beards mpd museum music mystery naval noir non-fiction one for the brow opera parody paul temple perl perl weekly challenge photography podcast politics postscript powers prediction privacy project woolsack pyracantha python quantum rail raku ranting raspberry pi reading reading boardgames social real life restaurant reviews romance rpg a day rpgs ruby rust science fiction scythe second world war security shipwreck simutrans smartphone south atlantic war squaddies stationery steampunk stuarts suburbia superheroes suspense television the resistance the weekly challenge thirsty meeples thriller tin soldier torg toys trailers travel type 26 type 31 type 45 vietnam war war wargaming weather wives and sweethearts writing about writing x-wing young adult
Special All book reviews, All film reviews
Produced by aikakirja v0.1