2019 historical fantasy, third and probably last of its series. The
various monstrous ladies – Mary Jekyll and Diana Hyde, Beatrice
Rappacini, Catherine Moreau, Justine Frankenstein, and Lucinda Van
Helsing – return from Budapest to find both Alice their housemaid and
Sherlock Holmes missing.
Some people found this book a disappointment, but for me the
series finally finds its feet. The writing has improved, there are
fewer heavy-handed Americanisms, and since relatively little of the
action happens in real London there's less opportunity for factual
error. (I have no idea what St Michael's Mount, scene of some of the
climactic events, is like in reality, and this probably helps.) There
also aren't as many character introductions as in earlier books – the
cast is already quite large – and even readers who don't know The
Jewel of Seven Stars shouldn't have trouble working out how the new
characters fit in. At the same time and rather to my surprise, I found
the world easier to believe in: yes, there are these various
conspiracies and most of the late-Victorian horrors have some sort of
reality – I was almost surprised that Madame Sara didn't show up at
some point – but unlike the second book I didn't get the feeling
that the supernatural strangenesses ought to be overpowering the
mundane and recognisable historical world.
"Oh goodness," said a woman in the black dress of a housekeeper, who
emerged from a door farther down the hall. The strange footman
peeked out from the doorway behind her. "Miss Jennings, I am so
pleased to see you, and Miss Van Helsing as well—Miss Jekyll has
told me all about you. I'm Mrs. Poole. But I'm afraid none of the
ladies are here right now. They're down in Cornwall trying to stop
Mrs. Raymond and some Egyptian mummy she resurrected from kidnapping
the Queen. I think you'd better come in. There's someone you should
meet."
Pacing remains odd; there's a false climax a little past the half-way
mark in which a great number of villainous plots are overset, only to
be replaced by different villainies, but all in all I thought this
worked rather well. After all, this is a consciously feminist take on
Victorian pulp literature; if the fatuous heroes are to be replaced by
women, why should the villains be exempted?
Do things reach a bit far, in that there's an actual plot to depose
Queen Victoria? Perhaps. But it's the sort of plot that makes sense
given the people who are setting it up. The sense of fun in the face
of danger returns: yes, our heroines know they are potentially facing
death if they fail, but one feels that none of them would swap their
lives for quiet ones in which nobody ever called on them for help.
It's been a while since I read the earlier books, but I enjoyed this
rather more than the middle volume, and perhaps even more than the
first – for me it brought back the joy of discovering the original
short story.
Comments on this post are now closed. If you have particular grounds for adding a late comment, comment on a more recent post quoting the URL of this one.