2005 mystery (modern police procedural plus amateur), fourth in its
series. The old family woodland is going to be sold to an alliance of
environmental group and logging company, and that triggers a variety
of bad behaviour.
I don't think it was necessarily the author's intention, but I
came out of this thinking that these people have a real cultural
masculinity problem. Most of what goes wrong in this book is caused by
unconsidered violence being the first impulsive response to an awkward
situation, followed by a desperate scramble to cover up, which then
causes more problems and drags in more people as conspirators,
victims, or both.
This also means that we get extended passages from killer's
perspective and from future victim's perspective, something I
generally don't like in mystery stories – it's fair enough as a way of
setting a mood, I suppose, and the economic collapse of the region as
hard male-coded logging jobs move out and soft female-coded tourism
jobs (to a very limited and seasonal extent) move in does get looked
at from multiple perspectives, but I'd have preferred to read a
version of this story that stuck with the viewpoint of the
investigators and presented the game fairly; tension while reading
this book comes not from trying to work out the solution, but from
being concerned as to whether the investigators will reach the right
solution, and in time.
Of course we also get the they-want-to-but-they-can't romance of van
Alstyne (married police chief) and Ferguson (Episcopalian priest
already in trouble with the church for not hating gay people enough,
and more generally for trying to be actually Christian rather than
just part of the polite establishment). They do at least take some
actions that don't involve mooning over each other, though I'm
unconvinced that van Alstyne telling all to his wife Linda will have
the positive effects he expects. (And after being introduced as
something of a stereotyped hard businesswoman in the first book, Linda
has gradually turned into a figure I find quite sympathetic, unhappy
about her husband giving not only his working hours but most of his
leisure time to his dangerous job.)
There are some awkward late revelations (if X knew this thing about Y
all along, why did they behave the way they did earlier) and I'm
getting a feeling that Spencer-Fleming is having trouble settling on
the sort of story she wants to tell beyond the relationship drama. But
these books are still weirdly interesting to me.
Comments on this post are now closed. If you have particular grounds for adding a late comment, comment on a more recent post quoting the URL of this one.